7.7 sec in total
2.9 sec
4.3 sec
484 ms
Visit reviewsnratings.com now to see the best up-to-date Reviewsnratings content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about reviewsnratings.com
Forsale Lander
Visit reviewsnratings.comWe analyzed Reviewsnratings.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.9 sec and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
reviewsnratings.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value7.0 s
6/100
25%
Value5.0 s
63/100
10%
Value770 ms
38/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value12.2 s
15/100
10%
2872 ms
147 ms
182 ms
167 ms
138 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewsnratings.com, 10% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Reviewsnratings.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (71%)
3.1 MB
896.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Reviewsnratings.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 135.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 135.3 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reviewsnratings images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 592.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 592.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviewsnratings.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 92% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (25%)
64
48
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reviewsnratings. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
reviewsnratings.com
2872 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
147 ms
settings.css
182 ms
style.css
167 ms
postratings-css.css
138 ms
css
24 ms
css
35 ms
js_composer.css
369 ms
style.css
412 ms
jquery.js
481 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
264 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
342 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
522 ms
widget.js
528 ms
Logo-300x46.png
106 ms
Logo-Inverse-Colors-300x51.png
114 ms
7-daily-moves-218x150.png
114 ms
MeraPharmacy-218x150.png
190 ms
maxresdefault-1-218x150.jpg
133 ms
ginger-218x150.png
215 ms
maxresdefault-218x150.jpg
224 ms
Fitbug_Orb_35566975-2837-218x150.jpg
240 ms
Striiv-218x150.jpg
245 ms
cta-garmin-connect-2011-218x150.gif
264 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
14 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
14 ms
newspaper.woff
276 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
21 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
21 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
20 ms
7-daily-moves-356x364.png
256 ms
hqdefault-356x220.jpg
108 ms
ginger-356x220.png
165 ms
exist_tracker-356x220.png
164 ms
webmd-356x220.jpeg
196 ms
maxresdefault-1-356x220.jpg
171 ms
1mg-356x355.png
224 ms
7-daily-moves-324x235.png
293 ms
MeraPharmacy-100x70.png
256 ms
maxresdefault-1-100x70.jpg
280 ms
hqdefault-100x70.jpg
276 ms
maxresdefault-100x70.jpg
300 ms
7-daily-moves-324x160.png
330 ms
MeraPharmacy-324x160.png
462 ms
ginger-100x70.png
376 ms
exist_tracker-100x70.png
399 ms
webmd-100x70.jpeg
380 ms
facebook.png
422 ms
google.png
429 ms
cta-garmin-connect-2011.gif
522 ms
1mg-100x70.png
465 ms
maxresdefault-100x70.jpg
572 ms
Doximity-iRounds-218x150.png
586 ms
maxresdefault-218x150.jpg
527 ms
Website-FB-Ad-Campaign-218x150.png
656 ms
fooducate-android-and-iphone2-218x150.jpg
576 ms
hqdefault-218x150.jpg
554 ms
exist_tracker-218x150.png
546 ms
webmd-218x150.jpeg
590 ms
maxresdefault-1-218x150.jpg
582 ms
elements.png
605 ms
1mg-218x150.png
564 ms
7-daily-moves-100x70.png
573 ms
Remedy-Social-Favicon_00-100x70.png
602 ms
Calculate-BMR_620-100x70.png
617 ms
postratings-js.js
599 ms
tagdiv_theme.js
856 ms
comment-reply.min.js
612 ms
wp-embed.min.js
629 ms
js_composer_front.js
637 ms
rating_over.gif
636 ms
W4wDsBUluyw0tK3tykhXEfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
5 ms
OLffGBTaF0XFOW1gnuHF0Z0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
45 ms
reviewsnratings.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
reviewsnratings.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
reviewsnratings.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewsnratings.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reviewsnratings.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reviewsnratings.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reviewsnratings. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: