9.7 sec in total
1.7 sec
7.3 sec
725 ms
Visit revisionpath.com now to see the best up-to-date Revision Path content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about revisionpath.com
This is Revision Path — an award-winning weekly showcase of Black designers, developers, and digital creatives from all over the world.
Visit revisionpath.comWe analyzed Revisionpath.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
revisionpath.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value16.0 s
0/100
25%
Value8.6 s
17/100
10%
Value690 ms
43/100
30%
Value0.009
100/100
15%
Value13.8 s
10/100
10%
1690 ms
447 ms
186 ms
191 ms
269 ms
Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Revisionpath.com, 8% (8 requests) were made to Sumome-140a.kxcdn.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Revisionpath.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (76%)
2.4 MB
566.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Revisionpath.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Revision Path images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 526.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 526.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Revisionpath.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 91% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 75 (77%)
98
23
The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Revision Path. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
revisionpath.com
1690 ms
webfont.js
447 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
186 ms
widget.css
191 ms
shortcodes.css
269 ms
styles.css
278 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
708 ms
woocommerce.css
353 ms
frontend.css
359 ms
chosen.css
427 ms
frontend.css
435 ms
packages.css
515 ms
style.css
969 ms
style.css
583 ms
css
1119 ms
css
1160 ms
css
1221 ms
bootstrap.min.css
739 ms
flexslider.css
772 ms
lightbox.css
811 ms
audio-player.css
847 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
875 ms
style.php
1333 ms
jetpack.css
950 ms
jquery.js
1096 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1039 ms
core.min.js
1108 ms
widget.min.js
1119 ms
accordion.min.js
4182 ms
tabs.min.js
1120 ms
thst-shortcodes-lib.js
1152 ms
modernizr.js
1165 ms
res_men.js
1187 ms
load.sumome.com
1121 ms
revisionpath.com
1612 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
989 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
998 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1015 ms
scripts.js
1056 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
1069 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
1081 ms
woocommerce.min.js
1120 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
1127 ms
apiresults.js
188 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
126 ms
e-201613.js
120 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
1132 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
1125 ms
call_fitvid.js
1154 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
1088 ms
call_flexslider.js
1094 ms
jquery.easing.1.2.js
1033 ms
lightbox-2.6.min.js
1056 ms
thst-recent-posts.js
996 ms
jquery.stellar.js
940 ms
call-stellar.js
827 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.js
831 ms
call-contscr.js
816 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
796 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
836 ms
call-masonry.js
1308 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1216 ms
wp-embed.min.js
693 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
726 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
662 ms
ga.js
188 ms
3183f6bcde0133e7b8c1511850536225
147 ms
adfc65176bd03c5f4042e5425d6e1559
147 ms
logo_revisionpath.png
536 ms
1920x500_header__kat_vellos.jpg
200 ms
header-loading-ani.gif
128 ms
geometry2.png
89 ms
bemnet-yemesgen-300.jpg
538 ms
antoinette-smith-300.jpg
200 ms
maurice-cherry-300.jpg
201 ms
ben-lindo-300-1-1.jpg
254 ms
dian-holton-300.jpg
528 ms
vince-baskerville-300.jpg
529 ms
hover_logo_75.png
526 ms
logo-dark-300x75.png
531 ms
fbdesign_logo.png
526 ms
f7881823e33565a1851d9ef467a9753f
191 ms
batch-icons-webfont.woff
441 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
510 ms
count.js
112 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
106 ms
__utm.gif
51 ms
revisionpath.com
607 ms
464 ms
270.GIF
127 ms
g.gif
76 ms
service.js
149 ms
service.js
220 ms
service.js
170 ms
service.js
219 ms
service.js
170 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
75 ms
sme-popup.css
77 ms
css
67 ms
sumome-welcome-popup.css
58 ms
sumome-share-client.css
130 ms
revisionpath.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
revisionpath.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
revisionpath.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Revisionpath.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Revisionpath.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
revisionpath.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Revision Path. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: