3.3 sec in total
Visit rfc.museum now to see the best up-to-date Rfc content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rfc.museum
Rubell Museum, one of the biggest private contemporary art collection in North AmericaVisit rfc.museum
We analyzed Rfc.museum page load time and found that the first response time was 831 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
rfc.museum performance score
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Rfc.museum, 20% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (831 ms) belongs to the original domain Rfc.museum.
Page size can be reduced by 702.8 kB (54%)
Potential reduce by 24.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rfc images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 336.6 kB
Potential reduce by 304.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rfc.museum needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 304.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (66%)
rfc.museum accessibility score
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
rfc.museum best practices score
Trust and Safety
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
rfc.museum SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Links are not crawlable
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rfc.museum can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rfc.museum main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rfc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: