3.5 sec in total
663 ms
2.6 sec
208 ms
Visit rgshw.com now to see the best up-to-date Rgshw content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rgshw.com
Royal Grammar School, High Wycombe, Bucks
Visit rgshw.comWe analyzed Rgshw.com page load time and found that the first response time was 663 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
rgshw.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.3 s
3/100
10%
Value20.9 s
0/100
25%
Value13.7 s
2/100
10%
Value870 ms
33/100
30%
Value1.414
0/100
15%
Value21.1 s
1/100
10%
663 ms
25 ms
700 ms
400 ms
241 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Rgshw.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (878 ms) belongs to the original domain Rgshw.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (39%)
3.9 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Rgshw.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 81.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.4 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 790.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rgshw needs image optimization as it can save up to 790.4 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 627.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 627.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rgshw.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (46%)
85
46
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rgshw. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
rgshw.com
663 ms
css
25 ms
jsHomepage
700 ms
cssHomepage
400 ms
WebResource.axd
241 ms
ScriptResource.axd
407 ms
ScriptResource.axd
176 ms
jsdebug
182 ms
fluidvids.min.js
191 ms
carouselFred.css
195 ms
jquery.ba-throttle-debounce.min.js
240 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
10 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
291 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js
386 ms
buttons.js
13 ms
get_flash_player.gif
30 ms
loading.png
125 ms
logo.png
124 ms
small_logo.png
125 ms
slide1.png
406 ms
slide1-1.png
372 ms
slide2.png
556 ms
slide2-1.png
355 ms
slide3.png
361 ms
slide3-1.png
630 ms
slide4.png
539 ms
slide4-1.png
802 ms
slide5.png
638 ms
slide5-1.png
649 ms
promosport.png
630 ms
promo-news.png
642 ms
promoatp.png
727 ms
languages-promo.png
721 ms
rgs-promo.png
736 ms
blog-promo.png
728 ms
rgs-generic-promo-image.jpg
736 ms
alice(1).png
817 ms
loadingYellow.png
797 ms
headMedia.png
788 ms
leftColBck.png
773 ms
liFirstLevelBckHover.png
765 ms
liDropDownLevelBckHover.png
836 ms
search.png
838 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
18 ms
zJY4gsxBiSo5L7tNutxFNg.ttf
19 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
19 ms
4cKlrioa77J2iqTqBgkRWg.ttf
19 ms
footerHomepage.png
791 ms
footerBand.png
788 ms
triangleUp.png
802 ms
triangleDown.png
808 ms
ribbonSprite.png
872 ms
homeCarArrows.png
862 ms
playArrows.png
870 ms
topLinkHov.png
878 ms
analytics.js
108 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
63 ms
btn_play.png
769 ms
btn_sound_on.png
779 ms
resourcesBck.png
819 ms
moreArrowHover.png
829 ms
collect
16 ms
collect
60 ms
getSegment.php
161 ms
checkOAuth.esi
32 ms
band2.png
726 ms
leftColBckIpad.png
725 ms
plus.png
735 ms
minus.png
713 ms
t.dhj
10 ms
t.dhj
16 ms
cm
41 ms
s-3271.xgi
16 ms
hbpix
45 ms
iPadDrpArwDwn.png
609 ms
xrefid.xgi
7 ms
18 ms
iPadDrpArwDwn2.png
601 ms
pixel
18 ms
12 ms
pixel
16 ms
2981
24 ms
menu_bg.png
543 ms
shieldw.png
541 ms
moreUp.png
560 ms
closed_accordion.png
567 ms
open_accordion.png
584 ms
flexslider-hover.png
519 ms
bg.png
532 ms
carIphoneRight.png
532 ms
carIphoneLeft.png
556 ms
hitarea.png
565 ms
icon_flash.png
517 ms
rgshw.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rgshw.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rgshw.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rgshw.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rgshw.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rgshw.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rgshw. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: