Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

rhinestonestudio.com

rhinestonestudio.com - rhinestonestudio Resources and Information.

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

231 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

817 ms

rhinestonestudio.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rhinestonestudio.com homepage info - get ready to check Rhinestonestudio best content right away, or after learning these important things about rhinestonestudio.com

rhinestonestudio.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, rhinestonestudio.com has it all. We...

Visit rhinestonestudio.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rhinestonestudio.com page load time and found that the first response time was 231 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rhinestonestudio.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

rhinestonestudio.com

231 ms

www.rhinestonestudio.com

220 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

104 ms

style.min.css

140 ms

styles.css

107 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Rhinestonestudio.com, 16% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (794 ms) belongs to the original domain Rhinestonestudio.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (42%)

Content Size

4.4 MB

After Optimization

2.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Rhinestonestudio.com main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 82.9 kB

  • Original 109.5 kB
  • After minification 105.5 kB
  • After compression 26.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 74.8 kB

  • Original 2.4 MB
  • After minification 2.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rhinestonestudio images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 395.8 kB

  • Original 509.8 kB
  • After minification 354.7 kB
  • After compression 114.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 395.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 1.3 MB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB
  • After compression 152.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rhinestonestudio.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (67%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rhinestonestudio. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

rhinestonestudio.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rhinestonestudio.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Rhinestonestudio.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rhinestonestudio. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: