Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

rhinocort.com

Nasal Allergy Relief | RHINOCORT® Allergy Spray

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

37 ms

Resources Loaded

941 ms

Page Rendered

265 ms

rhinocort.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing RHINOCORT content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rhinocort.com

Learn about how RHINOCORT® Allergy Spray offers powerful 24-hour OTC nasal allergy relief, and how you can say goodbye to nasal congestion.

Visit rhinocort.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rhinocort.com page load time and found that the first response time was 37 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rhinocort.com performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,620 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.526

14/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.4 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rhinocort.com

37 ms

www.rhinocort.com

96 ms

css_3ijmoGqFgneVPsJPSaYstpw_yp4XL1A-AtIs6N2LjfM.css

11 ms

css_cUDySkhsvR0e3Bxd9blHkT7BAr_-xX4_iShHeFWNTBY.css

13 ms

css_oujh0I7mpnywJ_WUlJd1NauEN0eBMzlRnZ_WhFRNlKM.css

11 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Rhinocort.com, 17% (12 requests) were made to Assets.adobedtm.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Cdn-social.janrain.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (398 ms) relates to the external source Assets.adobedtm.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (53%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Rhinocort.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 145.2 kB

  • Original 168.5 kB
  • After minification 161.9 kB
  • After compression 23.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 145.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 40.8 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RHINOCORT images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 855.7 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 850.0 kB
  • After compression 274.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 855.7 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 743.1 kB

  • Original 823.1 kB
  • After minification 812.1 kB
  • After compression 80.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rhinocort.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 743.1 kB or 90% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (57%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

29

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RHINOCORT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rhinocort.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rhinocort.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rhinocort.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rhinocort.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rhinocort.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RHINOCORT. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: