Tools & Wizards About Us
rhodacks.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

rhodacks.com

酵素ジュースを利用した置き換えダイエットで2ヶ月半に10キロもの体重減少に成功しました

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

772 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

535 ms

rhodacks.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rhodacks.com homepage info - get ready to check Rhodacks best content right away, or after learning these important things about rhodacks.com

酵素ジュースを利用した置き換えダイエットで2ヶ月半に10キロもの体重減少に成功しました

Visit rhodacks.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rhodacks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 772 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rhodacks.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

rhodacks.com

772 ms

jquery.min.js

33 ms

config.js

358 ms

styles.css

801 ms

textstyles.css

350 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Rhodacks.com, 5% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (934 ms) belongs to the original domain Rhodacks.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 116.3 kB (58%)

Content Size

201.9 kB

After Optimization

85.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rhodacks.com main page is 201.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 105.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 23.0 kB

  • Original 32.4 kB
  • After minification 32.3 kB
  • After compression 9.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.0 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 62.8 kB
  • After minification 61.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rhodacks images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 691 B

  • Original 935 B
  • After minification 534 B
  • After compression 244 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 691 B or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 91.4 kB

  • Original 105.9 kB
  • After minification 86.8 kB
  • After compression 14.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rhodacks.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 91.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (40%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rhodacks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rhodacks.com

rhodacks.com

772 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

33 ms

config.js

config.js

358 ms

styles.css

styles.css

801 ms

textstyles.css

textstyles.css

350 ms

header.jpg

header.jpg

462 ms

tables.css

tables.css

314 ms

commonstyles.css

commonstyles.css

315 ms

top_bg.gif

top_bg.gif

304 ms

border_bg.gif

border_bg.gif

306 ms

rss_button.png

rss_button.png

315 ms

sitemap_button.png

sitemap_button.png

357 ms

headerbox_bg.gif

headerbox_bg.gif

357 ms

headerbox_inner.gif

headerbox_inner.gif

520 ms

h3_bg.gif

h3_bg.gif

613 ms

whatsnew_title.gif

whatsnew_title.gif

613 ms

whatsnew_title_bg.gif

whatsnew_title_bg.gif

630 ms

menu_title_bg.gif

menu_title_bg.gif

679 ms

menulist_li_bg.gif

menulist_li_bg.gif

681 ms

menu_bg.png

menu_bg.png

830 ms

pagetop_button.png

pagetop_button.png

934 ms

SEO Factors

rhodacks.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    SHIFT_JIS

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rhodacks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rhodacks.com main page’s claimed encoding is shift_jis. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

rhodacks.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rhodacks. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: