842 ms in total
127 ms
385 ms
330 ms
Visit rhodescook.com now to see the best up-to-date Rhodes Cook content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rhodescook.com
Visit rhodescook.comWe analyzed Rhodescook.com page load time and found that the first response time was 127 ms and then it took 715 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
rhodescook.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
36/100
10%
Value3.8 s
54/100
25%
Value7.5 s
27/100
10%
Value140 ms
95/100
30%
Value0.058
98/100
15%
Value3.6 s
91/100
10%
127 ms
36 ms
19 ms
35 ms
24 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Rhodescook.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Static1.1.sqspcdn.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (127 ms) belongs to the original domain Rhodescook.com.
Page size can be reduced by 289.7 kB (68%)
423.8 kB
134.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Rhodescook.com main page is 423.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 246.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rhodes Cook needs image optimization as it can save up to 28.6 kB or 33% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 185.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 185.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rhodescook.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 42.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (63%)
38
14
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rhodes Cook. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
rhodescook.com
127 ms
common.css
36 ms
squarespace-gallery-slideshow.css
19 ms
yahoo-dom-event.js
35 ms
connection_core-min.js
24 ms
json-min.js
24 ms
animation-min.js
19 ms
selector.js
52 ms
element.js
31 ms
global.js
54 ms
lightbox.js
58 ms
api.js
60 ms
base64.js
61 ms
census.js
62 ms
yui2-yui3-bridge.js
62 ms
squarespace-gallery-slideshow.js
65 ms
cookie-min.js
63 ms
eu-cookie-policy.js
69 ms
webfont.js
58 ms
white_header_bg.jpg
41 ms
feed-icon-12x12-orange.png
15 ms
facebook.png
17 ms
twitter.png
18 ms
linkedin.png
17 ms
white_search_btn.gif
40 ms
h2title_dotted.gif
42 ms
transparent.png
19 ms
date.png
40 ms
comment.png
41 ms
reference.png
45 ms
share.png
46 ms
print.png
46 ms
email.png
45 ms
rhodes.jpg
89 ms
5230060-15300851-thumbnail.jpg
42 ms
RecordHit
18 ms
loading.gif
13 ms
overlay-arrow-left.png
12 ms
overlay-arrow-right.png
13 ms
rhodescook.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rhodescook.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rhodescook.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rhodescook.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rhodescook.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rhodescook.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rhodes Cook. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: