8.7 sec in total
2.9 sec
5.1 sec
703 ms
Visit richardsondesign.org now to see the best up-to-date Richardson Design content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about richardsondesign.org
Visit richardsondesign.orgWe analyzed Richardsondesign.org page load time and found that the first response time was 2.9 sec and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
richardsondesign.org performance score
2935 ms
152 ms
217 ms
187 ms
218 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Richardsondesign.org, 9% (6 requests) were made to Facebook.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Richardsondesign.org.
Page size can be reduced by 527.3 kB (50%)
1.0 MB
519.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Richardsondesign.org main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 535.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 83.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.5 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richardson Design images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 347.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 347.2 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 64.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richardsondesign.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 64.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (56%)
66
29
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richardson Design. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
richardsondesign.org
2935 ms
style.css
152 ms
output.css
217 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
187 ms
woocommerce.css
218 ms
slimbox2.css
202 ms
jquery.js
319 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
262 ms
narrow-rounded.css
262 ms
grunge-light.css
264 ms
addthis_widget.js
30 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
228 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
232 ms
woocommerce.min.js
322 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
323 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
321 ms
e-201611.js
4 ms
e-201611.js
47 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
276 ms
131655683533042.1455.1310966688.png
227 ms
bgr-tile.gif
102 ms
bgr.jpg
293 ms
28-RD_logo_website_300_x_140.jpg
294 ms
tab-hover.gif
103 ms
thumb.php
341 ms
ico-star.png
104 ms
btn-demo.png
226 ms
ico-latest.png
226 ms
ico-rss.gif
227 ms
box-bgr.jpg
229 ms
c-green.png
229 ms
FHExpos.png
362 ms
c-grey.png
294 ms
thumb.php
374 ms
thumb.php
408 ms
thumb.php
442 ms
thumb.php
421 ms
thumb.php
476 ms
thumb.php
543 ms
narrow-rounded.gif
448 ms
ico-html.gif
478 ms
ico-css.gif
485 ms
box-bgr.gif
514 ms
g.gif
114 ms
admin-ajax.php
1025 ms
300lo.json
39 ms
all.js&version=v2.0
410 ms
widgets.js
95 ms
pinit00.png
17 ms
counter.5524cceca805eb4b9b2b.js
21 ms
g.gif
18 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
52 ms
shares.json
46 ms
shares.json
38 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
127 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
61 ms
155 ms
xd_arbiter.php
144 ms
xd_arbiter.php
270 ms
jot.html
28 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
74 ms
ping
115 ms
like.php
113 ms
like.php
128 ms
like.php
124 ms
like.php
135 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
301 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
338 ms
richardsondesign.org SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richardsondesign.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Richardsondesign.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
richardsondesign.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Richardson Design. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: