8.5 sec in total
1.1 sec
7.1 sec
250 ms
Welcome to richtour.by homepage info - get ready to check Richtour best content right away, or after learning these important things about richtour.by
Visit richtour.byWe analyzed Richtour.by page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
richtour.by performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value8.9 s
1/100
25%
Value10.9 s
6/100
10%
Value1,500 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.348
32/100
15%
Value20.4 s
2/100
10%
1119 ms
416 ms
588 ms
418 ms
414 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Richtour.by and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Richtour.by.
Page size can be reduced by 603.9 kB (23%)
2.6 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Richtour.by main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 10.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.5 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 134.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richtour images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 374.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 374.1 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 84.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richtour.by needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 84.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (38%)
58
36
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richtour. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
richtour.by
1119 ms
calendar.css
416 ms
front.css
588 ms
djimageslider.css
418 ms
modal.css
414 ms
mootools-core.js
932 ms
core.js
402 ms
caption.js
785 ms
script.js
788 ms
mootools-more.js
1829 ms
moo.slider.js
789 ms
modal.js
957 ms
system.css
1169 ms
general.css
1168 ms
template.css
1514 ms
template.responsive.css
1293 ms
jquery.js
1878 ms
script.js
1878 ms
script.responsive.js
1536 ms
system.css
192 ms
page.jpeg
1257 ms
header.jpg
1241 ms
menuseparator.png
377 ms
544 ms
vmenuitemicon.png
380 ms
loader.gif
383 ms
01.jpg
1257 ms
02.jpg
1958 ms
03.jpg
2175 ms
04.jpg
1768 ms
05.jpg
2152 ms
06.jpg
2701 ms
prev.png
1625 ms
next.png
1996 ms
play.png
2146 ms
pause.png
2325 ms
wezyrholidays.png
2371 ms
tui.png
2515 ms
tuip.png
2522 ms
timevoyage.png
2534 ms
teztour.png
2694 ms
Sunmar.png
2736 ms
solvex_icon.png
2906 ms
Rosting.png
2888 ms
rainbowtours.png
2896 ms
PegasTouristik.png
3069 ms
netholiday.png
3068 ms
neckerman.png
3101 ms
NatalieTours.png
3263 ms
muzenidis.png
3271 ms
itaka.png
3275 ms
intercity.png
3425 ms
eximtuors.png
3451 ms
CoralTravel.png
3463 ms
biblioglobus.png
3624 ms
anextour.png
3629 ms
ABS.png
3277 ms
sunandfun.png
3424 ms
slg_50.png
3465 ms
richtour.by accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
richtour.by best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
richtour.by SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richtour.by can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richtour.by main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
richtour.by
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Richtour. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: