44.5 sec in total
692 ms
5.3 sec
38.4 sec
Click here to check amazing Ridelust content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ridelust.com
- Motion + Mobility
Visit ridelust.comWe analyzed Ridelust.com page load time and found that the first response time was 692 ms and then it took 43.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
ridelust.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value21.1 s
0/100
10%
Value0
0/100
25%
Value0
0/100
10%
Value200 ms
90/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value21.1 s
1/100
10%
692 ms
334 ms
198 ms
270 ms
465 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Ridelust.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Ox-d.popcrunch.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Ridelust.com.
Page size can be reduced by 792.1 kB (27%)
2.9 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Ridelust.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 59.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ridelust images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 638.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 638.5 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 62.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ridelust.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 62.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (16%)
44
37
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ridelust. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.ridelust.com
692 ms
style.css
334 ms
jquery.min.js
198 ms
main.js
270 ms
jetpack.css
465 ms
jquery.js
598 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
238 ms
KonaLibInline.js
19 ms
urchin.js
44 ms
js
267 ms
e-201736.js
54 ms
afr
1569 ms
afr
1349 ms
afr
1052 ms
background.png
1152 ms
logo.png
1129 ms
menu.png
1341 ms
featured-mask.png
1698 ms
1ferrari.jpg
1100 ms
flag-end.png
1099 ms
flag-background.png
1099 ms
featured-title-end.png
1100 ms
featured-title-background.png
1100 ms
0.intro_1.jpg
1369 ms
RamEcoDiesel.jpg
1321 ms
montage3-630x560.jpg
1473 ms
featured-number.png
1088 ms
social-background.png
1310 ms
social-buttons.png
1267 ms
post_title.png
1314 ms
0_intro.jpg
1315 ms
read_more_background.png
1313 ms
0_intro.jpg
1374 ms
ointro.jpg
1369 ms
osrkdezqvflzvze2kn8d-600x310.jpg
1306 ms
0intro.jpg
1354 ms
m743nz4cvdmojw75imwv-600x432.jpg
1392 ms
a4-desert-600x399.jpg
1720 ms
0intro.jpg
1333 ms
0.intro_.jpg
1792 ms
Lead1.jpg
1718 ms
next.png
1392 ms
search-button.png
1377 ms
FerrariMondial_2-300x200.jpg
1548 ms
promoted-title.png
1592 ms
T2eC16dHJIYFHOJ-plBrBSRNLD2oRg60_57-300x200.jpg
1739 ms
vglnk.js
584 ms
__utm.gif
468 ms
g.gif
352 ms
ridelust.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
ridelust.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ridelust.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Ridelust.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ridelust.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ridelust. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: