Tools & Wizards About Us
riester-tarifvergleich.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

riester-tarifvergleich.de

Günstige Riester Rente vergleichen - preiswerte billige Riesterrenten

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

350 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

164 ms

riester-tarifvergleich.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Riester Tarifvergleich content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about riester-tarifvergleich.de

Rechtsanwalt gibt Tipps zu Riester Rente vergleichen: So finden Sie ihre optimale Riesterrente. Riester Rente vergleichen.

Visit riester-tarifvergleich.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Riester-tarifvergleich.de page load time and found that the first response time was 350 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

riester-tarifvergleich.de performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

87/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value520 ms

56/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.2 s

62/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

riester-tarifvergleich.de

350 ms

format-riester-tarifvergleich.css

331 ms

ast.php

213 ms

signatur-riester-tarifvergleich.jpg

328 ms

portrait-riester-tarifvergleich.jpg

346 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Riester-tarifvergleich.de, 22% (2 requests) were made to Finanzen.de and 11% (1 request) were made to Top.yourweb.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (350 ms) belongs to the original domain Riester-tarifvergleich.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 134.1 kB (64%)

Content Size

210.4 kB

After Optimization

76.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Riester-tarifvergleich.de main page is 210.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 187.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 9.4 kB

  • Original 12.6 kB
  • After minification 12.0 kB
  • After compression 3.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.4 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 840 B

  • Original 9.7 kB
  • After minification 8.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Riester Tarifvergleich images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 123.7 kB

  • Original 187.9 kB
  • After minification 187.9 kB
  • After compression 64.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 123.7 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 140 B

  • Original 220 B
  • After minification 186 B
  • After compression 80 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Riester-tarifvergleich.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 140 B or 64% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Riester Tarifvergleich. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

riester-tarifvergleich.de

riester-tarifvergleich.de

350 ms

format-riester-tarifvergleich.css

format-riester-tarifvergleich.css

331 ms

ast.php

ast.php

213 ms

signatur-riester-tarifvergleich.jpg

signatur-riester-tarifvergleich.jpg

328 ms

portrait-riester-tarifvergleich.jpg

portrait-riester-tarifvergleich.jpg

346 ms

fdeam.nocache.js

fdeam.nocache.js

216 ms

Riester_Rente_finden.gif

Riester_Rente_finden.gif

109 ms

7DE46A8CD8C0336625E4A34DF7FAF158.cache.js

7DE46A8CD8C0336625E4A34DF7FAF158.cache.js

328 ms

198 ms

Accessibility Review

riester-tarifvergleich.de accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

riester-tarifvergleich.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

riester-tarifvergleich.de SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riester-tarifvergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Riester-tarifvergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

riester-tarifvergleich.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Riester Tarifvergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: