3.2 sec in total
540 ms
2.5 sec
193 ms
Visit rip.nl now to see the best up-to-date Rip content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rip.nl
Verhalen en beelden van vroeger en nu
Visit rip.nlWe analyzed Rip.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 540 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Rip.nl rating and web reputation
rip.nl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.8 s
4/100
10%
Value22.5 s
0/100
25%
Value10.7 s
7/100
10%
Value350 ms
73/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value11.8 s
17/100
10%
540 ms
268 ms
193 ms
191 ms
191 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 18% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Rip.nl, 25% (22 requests) were made to Media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com and 24% (21 requests) were made to Media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Thefreedictionary.com.
Page size can be reduced by 199.3 kB (15%)
1.3 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Rip.nl main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 92.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rip images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 89.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 89.5 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (14%)
83
71
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rip. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
rip.nl
540 ms
gen_25.1.gif
268 ms
gen_29.1.gif
193 ms
gen_46.1.gif
191 ms
gen_27.1.gif
191 ms
gen_41.1.gif
197 ms
gen_53.1.gif
190 ms
gen_65.1.gif
201 ms
gen_43.1.gif
202 ms
gen_31.1.gif
202 ms
gen_28.1.gif
272 ms
gen_30.1.gif
277 ms
sdk.js
10 ms
cb_style.css
286 ms
ajax.js
290 ms
chatbox.js
292 ms
pinit.js
31 ms
108 ms
xd_arbiter.php
55 ms
xd_arbiter.php
64 ms
d93e757e1104.png
25 ms
counter.js
258 ms
!wod!350!0.png
1770 ms
Help.gif
92 ms
logo468.gif
372 ms
ads.pl
352 ms
noieactivate.js
195 ms
!quote!350!1.png
1900 ms
!aod!350!3.png
1879 ms
!history!350!3.png
1904 ms
!birthday!350!3.png
1913 ms
!news!350!1.png
1837 ms
b-up.gif
85 ms
widgets.js
83 ms
pinit_main.js
95 ms
cf5f02a7dec1.png
7 ms
counter.php
300 ms
pointeur.gif
192 ms
312 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
121 ms
like.php
111 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
47 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
35 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
27 ms
default_30.png
18 ms
6fa92c8259c49c875c713b6e11d08061.jpg
101 ms
24d964e2baf0bb635eac0ae7cb4a40fe.jpg
36 ms
87d4f95f3c3d9190a1659c08adcf0a80.jpg
59 ms
0f6ee024b1793f4a103354c302b570b3.jpg
50 ms
fbcb905d51056643f8fd1f0e9c10a251.jpg
108 ms
0711a0305d110f5096ad0968fc2a6084.jpg
97 ms
308bfc12fe7cc38f3d0beed6c4781856.jpg
51 ms
0697c6f7caf1952250fbdf7baa313f1f.jpg
151 ms
97a3ae483104b26efaad2211edc9e26c.jpg
105 ms
fd9f18e34e7fde337bba02fef432cb59.jpg
103 ms
734d859b842b1715606dd4bf0ebde5d2.jpg
148 ms
b128895694a3f382e5dc882681c7ae34.jpg
172 ms
e3c0ac86305d866f5402536f725d14da.jpg
140 ms
1009231408a538a1da901e9c22c0e5ca.jpg
108 ms
9b140b9c7fe20b52d9fa2907f8f956b8.jpg
195 ms
2860e24367ebc77581f4b33e0136f4b5.jpg
214 ms
8339003ea548108ed22c93894e0d5e05.jpg
240 ms
1d531a443a486a5cc15aa8cb77ded3f4.jpg
201 ms
4bac5528dde69cd73280fdd4a1a0d43d.jpg
202 ms
8dfabd7d73878fb99297c2a7dc944084.jpg
263 ms
63d81499c36adec4c23fdcc35a46a914.jpg
293 ms
aab2a0d1388c97dab82aacc871020e13.jpg
307 ms
d3a14a6938c677f599917245fb17fc5c.jpg
246 ms
416775c1e7742e4e06a011313cf59efb.jpg
28 ms
080a57f7aacb708e85358e4da0a96aa6.jpg
47 ms
f12e18f64aeabf635f5e945da84619ca.jpg
25 ms
1534f1b2081256114389ca90715514b8.jpg
30 ms
215e02b03f44e96e63122fbb972fe9e4.jpg
48 ms
3c5520f4fc810525bc7819a8035931af.jpg
46 ms
1723d48cc6f90c858fb6b08012630fe5.jpg
45 ms
a420cffaa8e9986a234cfcc6fd9d391a.jpg
48 ms
746e0858a877387733bce1e53f6c215f.jpg
66 ms
a7334473f9813798f7cbed8f7547c578.jpg
60 ms
ca8f42d4ce6f8a80abbb4d66c242c031.jpg
66 ms
6b0782c1c17902b8caef0056d334e836.jpg
65 ms
cc86fdd59ba746054ce4fb098b328e2d.jpg
64 ms
2a034c37afd36f43553cfc82a9ef00a1.jpg
68 ms
986889d081e13bfb5d6471132f8e9b02.jpg
84 ms
d7cddb63dd0bd85c955ebca5f9855273.jpg
76 ms
85a0a0d35fa847239d2889fda88d85f3.jpg
85 ms
5a6d9375ac875180b8f6dc80619dedfd.jpg
140 ms
c1029a8b70835c195841b3db63ecb8ce.jpg
84 ms
9e0e73d062db179845a2ac07d1d91faa.jpg
94 ms
jot
96 ms
rip.nl accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rip.nl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
rip.nl SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
NL
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rip.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rip.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rip.nl
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rip. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: