Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 54

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 50

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

ripbar.com

RIPBAR.COM

Page Load Speed

548 ms in total

First Response

139 ms

Resources Loaded

261 ms

Page Rendered

148 ms

ripbar.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing RIPBAR content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ripbar.com

Forsale Lander

Visit ripbar.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ripbar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 139 ms and then it took 409 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ripbar.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ripbar.com

139 ms

tl.gif

39 ms

main.jpg

111 ms

WhatOthersSay.gif

87 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Ripbar.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (139 ms) belongs to the original domain Ripbar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 4.9 kB (9%)

Content Size

56.9 kB

After Optimization

52.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Ripbar.com main page is 56.9 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 50.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 6.6 kB
  • After minification 5.7 kB
  • After compression 1.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 901 B, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.9 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 50.3 kB
  • After minification 50.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RIPBAR images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RIPBAR. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

ripbar.com accessibility score

54

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ripbar.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ripbar.com SEO score

50

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ripbar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ripbar.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RIPBAR. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: