Tools & Wizards About Us
riskcontrol.co.jp screenshot

Report Summary

  • 71

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

riskcontrol.co.jp

株式会社 リスクコントロール

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

605 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

98 ms

riskcontrol.co.jp screenshot

About Website

Welcome to riskcontrol.co.jp homepage info - get ready to check Riskcontrol best content for Japan right away, or after learning these important things about riskcontrol.co.jp

企業向け危機管理、VIP・タレントの身辺警護、イベントセキュリティチェック、特殊調査等。

Visit riskcontrol.co.jp

Key Findings

We analyzed Riskcontrol.co.jp page load time and found that the first response time was 605 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

riskcontrol.co.jp performance score

71

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.1 s

87/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

riskcontrol.co.jp

605 ms

defaults.css

370 ms

bg01.gif

358 ms

spacer.gif

369 ms

top_01.gif

368 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Riskcontrol.co.jp, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Riskcontrol.co.jp.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 8.7 kB (5%)

Content Size

166.0 kB

After Optimization

157.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Riskcontrol.co.jp main page is 166.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 133.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 8.7 kB
  • After minification 8.5 kB
  • After compression 2.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.3 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 428 B

  • Original 133.8 kB
  • After minification 133.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Riskcontrol images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 2.4 kB
  • After minification 1.9 kB
  • After compression 487 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Riskcontrol.co.jp needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (25%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Riskcontrol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

riskcontrol.co.jp

riskcontrol.co.jp

605 ms

defaults.css

defaults.css

370 ms

bg01.gif

bg01.gif

358 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

369 ms

top_01.gif

top_01.gif

368 ms

top_02.gif

top_02.gif

368 ms

top_03.jpg

top_03.jpg

377 ms

top_04.gif

top_04.gif

378 ms

top_05.jpg

top_05.jpg

1092 ms

top_06.jpg

top_06.jpg

898 ms

top_07.jpg

top_07.jpg

733 ms

top_08.jpg

top_08.jpg

733 ms

top_09.jpg

top_09.jpg

907 ms

top_10.jpg

top_10.jpg

743 ms

top_11.jpg

top_11.jpg

1099 ms

top_12.jpg

top_12.jpg

1099 ms

top_13.jpg

top_13.jpg

1099 ms

top_14.jpg

top_14.jpg

1266 ms

top_15.jpg

top_15.jpg

1288 ms

top_16.jpg

top_16.jpg

1463 ms

top_17.jpg

top_17.jpg

1470 ms

top_18.gif

top_18.gif

1464 ms

top_19.gif

top_19.gif

1479 ms

top_20.jpg

top_20.jpg

1645 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

8 ms

collect

collect

29 ms

js

js

99 ms

top_04-over.gif

top_04-over.gif

180 ms

top_11-over.jpg

top_11-over.jpg

356 ms

top_12-over.jpg

top_12-over.jpg

358 ms

top_14-over.jpg

top_14-over.jpg

357 ms

top_15-over.jpg

top_15-over.jpg

368 ms

top_16-over.jpg

top_16-over.jpg

380 ms

Accessibility Review

riskcontrol.co.jp accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

riskcontrol.co.jp best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

riskcontrol.co.jp SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riskcontrol.co.jp can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Riskcontrol.co.jp main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

riskcontrol.co.jp

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Riskcontrol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: