4.9 sec in total
454 ms
3.9 sec
634 ms
Click here to check amazing Ritten content for Italy. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ritten.com
Visit ritten.comWe analyzed Ritten.com page load time and found that the first response time was 454 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
ritten.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
17/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value6.9 s
34/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.265
46/100
15%
Value7.0 s
52/100
10%
454 ms
562 ms
42 ms
218 ms
226 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Ritten.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Ritten.com.
Page size can be reduced by 721.6 kB (37%)
1.9 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Ritten.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.0 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 577.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ritten needs image optimization as it can save up to 577.5 kB or 33% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 99.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 99.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ritten.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.5 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (51%)
57
28
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ritten. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ritten.com
454 ms
www.ritten.com
562 ms
jquery.min.js
42 ms
functions.js
218 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.0-packed.js
226 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
236 ms
date.js
239 ms
date_en.js
218 ms
jquery.datePicker.min.js
217 ms
datePicker.css
450 ms
all.css.php
465 ms
swipebox.min.css
451 ms
platform.js
107 ms
jquery.swipebox.min.js
454 ms
css
35 ms
sdk.js
352 ms
fruehling-ritten.jpg
1529 ms
rittner-seilbahn.jpg
916 ms
erdpyramiden-ritten.jpg
643 ms
icon_8.png
387 ms
keyvisual-t-spacer.gif
235 ms
s02.jpg
412 ms
15-mountainbike.jpg
610 ms
1-reiten.jpg
633 ms
22_s22.jpg
811 ms
25-besuch-bei-bauern-bienen.jpg
1093 ms
16-rittner-bahn-seilbahn.jpg
1084 ms
9-hotel-tann-sommer-en.png
1489 ms
5-hotel-bemelmans-winter-en.jpg
1320 ms
7-weihrerhof-en.png
1661 ms
raiffeisenkasse-ritten.gif
1320 ms
keyvisual-b-spacer.gif
1322 ms
widgets.js
266 ms
gtm.js
169 ms
ritten-renon.gif
1605 ms
naviControl.png
1493 ms
lupe.gif
1494 ms
partner.gif
1701 ms
transparent_w90.png
1706 ms
loader.gif
1726 ms
hShadow.png
1726 ms
keyvisual-t-small.jpg
1928 ms
transparent_w80.png
1833 ms
cal2.gif
1905 ms
naviBGverlauf.png
1910 ms
socialButtons.gif
1930 ms
keyvisual-b.jpg
2158 ms
iconsR.png
2036 ms
plusone.js
75 ms
transparent_b70.png
2050 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
102 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMQFhaRv2pGgT5Kf0An0s4MM.woff
136 ms
suedtirol_pro_w.woff
2176 ms
scrollPfeile70x70.png
2024 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
108 ms
analytics.js
94 ms
watch.js
3 ms
collect
28 ms
collect
100 ms
238 ms
xd_arbiter.php
228 ms
xd_arbiter.php
483 ms
ga-audiences
79 ms
ritten.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
ritten.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ritten.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a valid hreflang
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ritten.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ritten.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
ritten.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ritten. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: