Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    34% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    41% of websites

Page Load Speed

809 ms in total

First Response

200 ms

Resources Loaded

421 ms

Page Rendered

188 ms

rivet-rivet.net screenshot

About Website

Visit rivet-rivet.net now to see the best up-to-date Rivet content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rivet-rivet.net

Rivet is a curatorial office founded by Sarah Demeuse and Manuela Moscoso in 2010.

Visit rivet-rivet.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Rivet-rivet.net page load time and found that the first response time was 200 ms and then it took 609 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rivet-rivet.net performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

93/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rivet-rivet.net

200 ms

style.css

21 ms

jquery.min.js

8 ms

functions.js

11 ms

Hyphenator.js

8 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Rivet-rivet.net, 14% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (200 ms) belongs to the original domain Rivet-rivet.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 61.8 kB (67%)

Content Size

91.6 kB

After Optimization

29.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Rivet-rivet.net main page is 91.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 78.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 4.2 kB
  • After minification 4.0 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.8 kB or 68% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 51.6 kB

  • Original 78.6 kB
  • After minification 78.6 kB
  • After compression 27.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 51.6 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 7.4 kB

  • Original 8.9 kB
  • After minification 7.2 kB
  • After compression 1.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rivet-rivet.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rivet . According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

rivet-rivet.net accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

rivet-rivet.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rivet-rivet.net SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rivet-rivet.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rivet-rivet.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rivet . Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: