Tools & Wizards About Us
rixalto.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

rixalto.com

Rixalto - Marketing Automation

Page Load Speed

5.8 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

728 ms

rixalto.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rixalto content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rixalto.com

Far crescere il tuo Business con Rixalto. Il primo software di marketing facile ed intuitivo. Aumenta il tuo fatturato.

Visit rixalto.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rixalto.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rixalto.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.5 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.404

25/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.3 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rixalto.com

1587 ms

css2

29 ms

header.css

354 ms

home-banner.css

357 ms

styles.css

345 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Rixalto.com, 11% (6 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Rixalto.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 860.0 kB (77%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

254.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rixalto.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 517.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 101.9 kB

  • Original 116.9 kB
  • After minification 98.2 kB
  • After compression 15.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.7 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 101.9 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 3.9 kB
  • After minification 3.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rixalto images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 340.1 kB

  • Original 517.4 kB
  • After minification 513.9 kB
  • After compression 177.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 340.1 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 418.0 kB

  • Original 476.5 kB
  • After minification 359.7 kB
  • After compression 58.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rixalto.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 418.0 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (81%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rixalto. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rixalto.com

rixalto.com

1587 ms

css2

css2

29 ms

header.css

header.css

354 ms

home-banner.css

home-banner.css

357 ms

styles.css

styles.css

345 ms

css

css

13 ms

style.css

style.css

792 ms

style.basic.css

style.basic.css

483 ms

style-curvy-black.css

style-curvy-black.css

366 ms

sassy-social-share-public.css

sassy-social-share-public.css

367 ms

srpw-frontend.css

srpw-frontend.css

369 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

578 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

488 ms

js

js

49 ms

css

css

19 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

38 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

47 ms

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

30 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

51 ms

a4cea2dab2.js

a4cea2dab2.js

123 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

41 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

49 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

47 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

264 ms

plugins.css

plugins.css

498 ms

home-body.css

home-body.css

379 ms

inner-body.css

inner-body.css

756 ms

inner-banner.css

inner-banner.css

384 ms

footer.css

footer.css

478 ms

index.js

index.js

502 ms

index.js

index.js

504 ms

asl-prereq.js

asl-prereq.js

754 ms

asl-core.js

asl-core.js

772 ms

asl-results-vertical.js

asl-results-vertical.js

772 ms

asl-autocomplete.js

asl-autocomplete.js

773 ms

asl-load.js

asl-load.js

773 ms

asl-wrapper.js

asl-wrapper.js

773 ms

sassy-social-share-public.js

sassy-social-share-public.js

954 ms

component.js

component.js

895 ms

edit-js.js

edit-js.js

774 ms

Logo-trasparente1.png

Logo-trasparente1.png

151 ms

circle-icon.webp

circle-icon.webp

151 ms

js

js

61 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

36 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

57 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

22 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

73 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaooCP.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaooCP.ttf

73 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoooCP.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoooCP.ttf

90 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpYCP.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpYCP.ttf

100 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pYCP.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pYCP.ttf

101 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapYCP.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapYCP.ttf

115 ms

banner.webp

banner.webp

124 ms

ciao-img-2.webp

ciao-img-2.webp

123 ms

heading-arrow.webp

heading-arrow.webp

124 ms

email-icon.webp

email-icon.webp

124 ms

collect

collect

56 ms

Accessibility Review

rixalto.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

rixalto.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rixalto.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    IT

  • Language Claimed

    IT

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rixalto.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rixalto.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rixalto.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rixalto. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: