7.7 sec in total
548 ms
6.8 sec
385 ms
Welcome to rmrajapurkar.com homepage info - get ready to check Rmrajapurkar best content right away, or after learning these important things about rmrajapurkar.com
Our Team Members
Visit rmrajapurkar.comWe analyzed Rmrajapurkar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 548 ms and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
rmrajapurkar.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.3 s
0/100
10%
Value11.2 s
0/100
25%
Value11.6 s
4/100
10%
Value920 ms
30/100
30%
Value0.065
97/100
15%
Value10.7 s
22/100
10%
548 ms
1757 ms
20 ms
850 ms
1309 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Rmrajapurkar.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Rmrajapurkar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 980.4 kB (25%)
3.9 MB
2.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Rmrajapurkar.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 178.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 178.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 182.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rmrajapurkar images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 329.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 329.2 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 290.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rmrajapurkar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 290.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (38%)
60
37
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rmrajapurkar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rmrajapurkar.com
548 ms
rmrajapurkar.com
1757 ms
jquery-1.9.1.js
20 ms
afterloginbar.css
850 ms
animate.min.css
1309 ms
aos.css
1100 ms
aos.js
887 ms
blog.css
909 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1158 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1365 ms
ca-style.css
1174 ms
camera.css
1397 ms
camera.min.js
1402 ms
chat.css
1396 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1413 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
1530 ms
login.css
1575 ms
menu.js
1607 ms
style-main.css
1626 ms
test.css
1619 ms
WebResource.axd
1628 ms
WebResource.axd
1747 ms
WebResource.axd
1169 ms
Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd
1248 ms
css2
31 ms
css2
43 ms
css2
47 ms
Rapper.jpg
291 ms
tp-ph.png
289 ms
tp-msg.png
290 ms
ca-logo.png
291 ms
whats-new.jpg
292 ms
caret1.png
429 ms
vmission.png
445 ms
firm-bg.png
446 ms
ser-img1.jpg
445 ms
ravi.jpg
899 ms
chin.jpg
464 ms
chetan.jpg
544 ms
gaya.jpg
664 ms
arrow2.png
665 ms
ft-logo.png
662 ms
map-icon.png
677 ms
ph-icon.png
757 ms
mail-icon.png
884 ms
fb-icon.png
882 ms
link-icon.png
886 ms
WebResource.axd
747 ms
WebResource.axd
827 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
910 ms
ser-bg.jpg
1540 ms
query-bg.jpg
1093 ms
M4.jpg%20
913 ms
ft-bg.jpg
3355 ms
arrow1.png
967 ms
GetAllCategories
1858 ms
camera_skins.png
893 ms
camera-loader.gif
892 ms
v1.jpg
972 ms
v2.jpg
1522 ms
v3.jpg
1759 ms
v4.jpg
2289 ms
v1.jpg
1186 ms
undefined
1401 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
912 ms
v2.jpg
544 ms
OrAvatar-1.jpg
213 ms
rmrajapurkar.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
rmrajapurkar.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
rmrajapurkar.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rmrajapurkar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rmrajapurkar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rmrajapurkar.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rmrajapurkar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: