3.7 sec in total
1.1 sec
2.4 sec
239 ms
Welcome to rmu.net homepage info - get ready to check Rmu best content right away, or after learning these important things about rmu.net
The RMU Vision is to provide reliable cost effective electric, water, water reclamation and advanced communication services. Use of the latest technol...
Visit rmu.netWe analyzed Rmu.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
rmu.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value7.3 s
29/100
10%
Value150 ms
95/100
30%
Value0.171
70/100
15%
Value8.0 s
43/100
10%
1086 ms
19 ms
32 ms
55 ms
62 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Rmu.net, 7% (5 requests) were made to Local.nixle.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Rmu.net.
Page size can be reduced by 917.5 kB (55%)
1.7 MB
761.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Rmu.net main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 679.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 32.6 kB, which is 46% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.5 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 60.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rmu needs image optimization as it can save up to 60.0 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 479.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 479.7 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 315.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rmu.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 315.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (49%)
71
36
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rmu. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rmu.net
1086 ms
k2.css
19 ms
grid-responsive.css
32 ms
bootstrap.css
55 ms
master-14cf203b9f3f830ae6ac1c0af4f2086a.css
62 ms
master-opera.css
10 ms
demo-14cf203b9f3f830ae6ac1c0af4f2086a.css
23 ms
mediaqueries.css
69 ms
menu.css
50 ms
rt_acacia-custom.css
47 ms
slideshow.css
39 ms
mootools-core.js
113 ms
core.js
66 ms
jquery.min.js
135 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
65 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
72 ms
k2.js
104 ms
caption.js
65 ms
bootstrap.min.js
105 ms
mootools-more.js
132 ms
moofx.js
129 ms
progress.js
130 ms
progress_init.js
129 ms
chart.js
186 ms
browser-engines.js
129 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
187 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
184 ms
sidemenu.js
184 ms
mootools-mobile.js
189 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
186 ms
roksprocket.js
188 ms
moofx.js
190 ms
features.js
195 ms
slideshow.js
190 ms
html5fallback.js
195 ms
analytics.js
96 ms
main-back.jpg
30 ms
feedback-red.png
13 ms
header-shadow.png
13 ms
feature-back-1200.png
30 ms
main-logo.png
31 ms
main-logo-int.png
29 ms
home-header.gif
32 ms
main-top.png
39 ms
78d607068cd064420401737e12f83bae_S.jpg
36 ms
e1e1ad60f07c4aa3ccbcb2973e9d7007_S.jpg
63 ms
542390225756f78888142d54f3d17e01_S.jpg
48 ms
c1572c59821062c96d0fc33ad32a2983_S.jpg
42 ms
nav-right.png
40 ms
nav-left.png
44 ms
apply-for-service.png
45 ms
cancel-service.png
47 ms
report-a-concern.png
48 ms
department-directory.png
50 ms
employment.png
50 ms
bids-proposals.png
51 ms
sustainability-scape.jpg
81 ms
hcm-billpay.jpg
63 ms
hcm-nixle.jpg
59 ms
hcm-communications.jpg
68 ms
rmu-btm-logo.png
60 ms
DEEDLogo.jpg
97 ms
facebook-icon.png
69 ms
twitter-icon.png
69 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
100 ms
collect
14 ms
collect
6 ms
306 ms
jquery-1.6.1.min.js
517 ms
widget_helper.js
217 ms
ww_signup_sm.gif
305 ms
powered_by_nixle_sm.gif
335 ms
rmu.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
rmu.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rmu.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rmu.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rmu.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rmu.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rmu. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: