4.6 sec in total
1.8 sec
2.3 sec
495 ms
Click here to check amazing Roadabode content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about roadabode.com
We dive deep into your digital marketing practices to discover what’s working and what is not, helping modern marketers maximize online digital marketing.
Visit roadabode.comWe analyzed Roadabode.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
roadabode.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
7/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value10.7 s
7/100
10%
Value1,900 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.753
6/100
15%
Value13.5 s
11/100
10%
1804 ms
64 ms
59 ms
49 ms
77 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Roadabode.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Roadabode.com.
Page size can be reduced by 147.8 kB (6%)
2.6 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Roadabode.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 79.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Roadabode images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 31.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 31.6 kB or 21% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Roadabode.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (84%)
62
10
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Roadabode. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 49 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
roadabode.com
1804 ms
analytics.js
64 ms
js
59 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
49 ms
placeholders.css
77 ms
thrive_flat.css
192 ms
style.css
78 ms
reset.css
76 ms
main_orange.css
115 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
91 ms
jquery.min.js
131 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
110 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
111 ms
masonry.min.js
109 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
133 ms
general.min.js
143 ms
moxie.min.js
167 ms
acf-dynamic-elements.min.js
141 ms
audio.min.js
158 ms
contact-form-compat.min.js
158 ms
content-reveal.min.js
171 ms
countdown.min.js
172 ms
conditional-display.min.js
322 ms
search-form.min.js
321 ms
dropdown.min.js
322 ms
divider.min.js
323 ms
plupload.min.js
323 ms
file-upload.min.js
325 ms
fill-counter.min.js
325 ms
number-counter.min.js
326 ms
image-gallery-libs.min.js
326 ms
image-gallery.min.js
329 ms
lead-generation.min.js
330 ms
login.min.js
330 ms
menu.min.js
331 ms
number-counter-compat.min.js
330 ms
post-grid-compat.min.js
333 ms
pagination.min.js
332 ms
post-list.min.js
330 ms
js
63 ms
collect
15 ms
post-list-filter.min.js
294 ms
pricing-table.min.js
269 ms
progress-bar.min.js
269 ms
social-share.min.js
256 ms
collect
20 ms
table.min.js
237 ms
tabs.min.js
235 ms
timer.min.js
235 ms
toc.min.js
234 ms
toggle.min.js
222 ms
twitter.min.js
217 ms
user-profile.min.js
217 ms
video.min.js
206 ms
script.js
207 ms
frontend.min.js
195 ms
wp-embed.min.js
195 ms
no-campaign.min.js
195 ms
Untitled-design-1.png
93 ms
Untitled-design1.png
196 ms
Evanne-Schmarder-Digital-Marketing-Consultant-Roadabode-Productions.jpg
193 ms
HomePage-Block1.png
53 ms
HomePage-Block-3.png
54 ms
Home-Page-Block-3a.png
69 ms
Roboto.ttf
127 ms
roadabode.com accessibility score
roadabode.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
roadabode.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Roadabode.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Roadabode.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
roadabode.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Roadabode. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: