12 sec in total
2.8 sec
8.4 sec
815 ms
Visit robotfreak.de now to see the best up-to-date Robotfreak content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about robotfreak.de
Robotik, Elektronik, Arduino und mehr
Visit robotfreak.deWe analyzed Robotfreak.de page load time and found that the first response time was 2.8 sec and then it took 9.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
robotfreak.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value8.0 s
2/100
25%
Value6.7 s
35/100
10%
Value520 ms
56/100
30%
Value0.483
17/100
15%
Value6.3 s
61/100
10%
2806 ms
200 ms
222 ms
223 ms
219 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Robotfreak.de, 10% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Robotfreak.de.
Page size can be reduced by 844.7 kB (70%)
1.2 MB
366.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Robotfreak.de main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 571.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.7 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 160 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Robotfreak images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 328.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 328.6 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 458.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Robotfreak.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 458.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (79%)
58
12
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Robotfreak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.robotfreak.de
2806 ms
language-selector.css
200 ms
toolbar.css
222 ms
style.css
223 ms
pe2-display.css
219 ms
photoswipe.css
229 ms
twentyfourteen.css
219 ms
crayon.min.css
306 ms
classic.css
304 ms
monaco.css
318 ms
social_widget.css
317 ms
style.css
320 ms
css
85 ms
genericons.css
409 ms
style.css
502 ms
style.css
407 ms
default.min.css
421 ms
jetpack.css
434 ms
colorbox.min.css
424 ms
jquery.js
622 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
524 ms
flags.js
535 ms
toolbar.js
537 ms
load-toolbar.js
549 ms
klass.min.js
605 ms
code.photoswipe.jquery-3.0.5.min.js
652 ms
crayon.min.js
661 ms
twentyfourteen.css
2482 ms
sitepress.js
664 ms
element.js
42 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
6 ms
gprofiles.js
62 ms
wpgroho.js
638 ms
functions.js
650 ms
jquery.colorbox.1.5.9-min.js
663 ms
wp-embed.min.js
681 ms
adsbygoogle.js
12 ms
e-201611.js
12 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
562 ms
link-indication_style.css
155 ms
9783955616441.jpg
630 ms
chart
128 ms
bobs1260x240.gif
132 ms
link-icon_external.gif
125 ms
pattern-light.svg
132 ms
IMG_0456-672x372.jpg
134 ms
CIMG3867-672x372.jpg
137 ms
MurcsPi-Tutorial5-672x372.jpg
132 ms
MakerFaireBerlin_640_extern-640x372.jpg
229 ms
rss.png
263 ms
googleplus.png
265 ms
twitter.png
244 ms
flickr.png
241 ms
youtube.png
264 ms
github.png
545 ms
rss.png
547 ms
nav-arrow-down.png
547 ms
de.png
615 ms
en.png
615 ms
wU8Q7gIdiMI
123 ms
bAhLW1eq8eM
159 ms
NcBaYAmRoXc
153 ms
RCXGpEmFbOw
129 ms
c5zEo8XlHSE
149 ms
YDm0fHJkPlI
149 ms
2V_mouV5odI0UgtVODTOwvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff
61 ms
7YeX5qGGVrvjpqFsvxNSRALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.woff
83 ms
sccV8o9st-AMv7Su44YKKQLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.woff
103 ms
Ue1lpEind3fdmHHQkRYdowLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.woff
104 ms
Genericons.svg
496 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
9 ms
NdyT62s2uoMQ_OHiZ3MeDevvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.woff
96 ms
XNVd6tsqi9wmKNvnh5HNELO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
102 ms
AcvTq8Q0lyKKNxRlL28Rn7O3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
94 ms
translateelement.css
109 ms
main.js
353 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
294 ms
www-embed-player.js
338 ms
base.js
433 ms
hovercard.css
131 ms
services.css
134 ms
flags.png
406 ms
g.gif
63 ms
element_main.js
80 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
197 ms
ad_status.js
183 ms
translate_24dp.png
71 ms
l
102 ms
googlelogo_color_42x16dp.png
32 ms
CrYjSnGjrRCn0pd9VQsnFOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.woff
5 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
7 ms
robotfreak.de accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
robotfreak.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
robotfreak.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Robotfreak.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Robotfreak.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
robotfreak.de
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Robotfreak. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: