4.8 sec in total
1.3 sec
2.7 sec
794 ms
Visit rochelleskinbeauty.com now to see the best up-to-date Rochelleskinbeauty content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rochelleskinbeauty.com
辽阳皮革营运部jizjn,盐城家具制造经销部,株洲挖掘机服务中心,江门石材经销部,海南食品机械经销部
Visit rochelleskinbeauty.comWe analyzed Rochelleskinbeauty.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
rochelleskinbeauty.com performance score
1332 ms
96 ms
25 ms
36 ms
182 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Rochelleskinbeauty.com, 19% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Rochelleskinbeauty.com.
Page size can be reduced by 888.9 kB (32%)
2.8 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Rochelleskinbeauty.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 156.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rochelleskinbeauty images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 275.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 275.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 401.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rochelleskinbeauty.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 401.8 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (38%)
45
28
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rochelleskinbeauty. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rochelleskinbeauty.com
1332 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
96 ms
css
25 ms
css
36 ms
style.css
182 ms
shortcodes.css
90 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
85 ms
magnific_popup.css
88 ms
jquery.js
201 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
170 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
169 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
199 ms
custom.js
290 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
290 ms
waypoints.min.js
290 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
292 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
329 ms
wp-embed.min.js
290 ms
jquery.hashchange.js
337 ms
logo-hitam.png
344 ms
ra1.jpg
341 ms
ra2.jpg
342 ms
ra3.jpg
340 ms
ra27.jpg
346 ms
ra28.jpg
462 ms
ra29.jpg
504 ms
ra30.jpg
548 ms
ra31.jpg
557 ms
ramalan-bintang-300x199.png
550 ms
10.png
610 ms
9.png
639 ms
8.png
697 ms
7.png
723 ms
1.png
726 ms
2.jpg
714 ms
3.png
797 ms
4.jpg
817 ms
affiliate1.jpg
881 ms
affiliate-2.jpg
1073 ms
2610-03.jpg
977 ms
BPOM.jpg
991 ms
banner-harga6.jpg
1068 ms
Ur66QXTDfN1RjqAm41DRZV02b4v3fUxqf9CZJ1qUoIA.ttf
57 ms
sdk.js
282 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
42 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
43 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
255 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
254 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
254 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBl02b4v3fUxqf9CZJ1qUoIA.ttf
255 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxvqEJM-AK1nFUafhVdytxUY.ttf
253 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxmYImPRL1w80NlYTQ8LOqf4.ttf
272 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxiBnJMIPt0VoltfALX9gDFQ.ttf
272 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxk7Gbs5Oj9RrfpUUQRHsz5w.ttf
272 ms
ETmodules_v2_4.ttf
1014 ms
120 ms
xd_arbiter.php
213 ms
xd_arbiter.php
422 ms
rochelleskinbeauty.com SEO score
ZH
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rochelleskinbeauty.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Rochelleskinbeauty.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rochelleskinbeauty.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rochelleskinbeauty. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: