Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

rockalittle.com

The Nicks Fix

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

314 ms

Resources Loaded

791 ms

Page Rendered

568 ms

rockalittle.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rockalittle.com now to see the best up-to-date Rockalittle content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rockalittle.com

The Official Stevie Nicks Website

Visit rockalittle.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rockalittle.com page load time and found that the first response time was 314 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rockalittle.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rockalittle.com

314 ms

contents.htm

97 ms

main.htm

138 ms

tisl_background2.gif

170 ms

nicksfix_masthead2.jpg

104 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Rockalittle.com, 14% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (386 ms) belongs to the original domain Rockalittle.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 30.3 kB (7%)

Content Size

460.2 kB

After Optimization

429.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Rockalittle.com main page is 460.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 458.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 922 B

  • Original 1.7 kB
  • After minification 1.5 kB
  • After compression 737 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 922 B or 56% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 29.4 kB

  • Original 458.5 kB
  • After minification 429.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rockalittle images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rockalittle. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

rockalittle.com accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

rockalittle.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rockalittle.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rockalittle.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rockalittle.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rockalittle. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: