3.6 sec in total
170 ms
2.8 sec
639 ms
Visit rockchalkblog.com now to see the best up-to-date Rock Chalk Blog content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rockchalkblog.com
Your home for coverage of Kansas Jayhawks basketball and football.
Visit rockchalkblog.comWe analyzed Rockchalkblog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 170 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
rockchalkblog.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value6.4 s
41/100
10%
Value900 ms
32/100
30%
Value0.377
28/100
15%
Value8.7 s
37/100
10%
170 ms
62 ms
43 ms
121 ms
140 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Rockchalkblog.com, 10% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 511.2 kB (24%)
2.1 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Rockchalkblog.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 59.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rock Chalk Blog images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 182.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 182.9 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 266.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rockchalkblog.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 266.0 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (62%)
42
16
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rock Chalk Blog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rockchalkblog.com
170 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
62 ms
css
43 ms
font-awesome.min.css
121 ms
style.css
140 ms
style.css
131 ms
jetpack.css
152 ms
addtoany.min.css
148 ms
jquery.js
233 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
204 ms
scripts.js
200 ms
photon.js
204 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
13 ms
gprofiles.js
56 ms
wpgroho.js
215 ms
wp-embed.min.js
220 ms
e-201611.js
3 ms
analytics.js
41 ms
RCB-KU-UCONN-FINAL.jpg
341 ms
QF-d3oZK.jpg
36 ms
text-wallpaper-red-on-blue-wide.png
337 ms
blue-banner-close-crop.png
164 ms
image17.jpg
2343 ms
securedownload.png
28 ms
image7-e1458019973382.jpg
327 ms
EgBlzoNBIHxNPCMwXaAhYPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
24 ms
QABk9IxT-LFTJ_dQzv7xpJ0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
25 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
24 ms
HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
24 ms
bH7276GfdCjMjApa_dkG6aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
23 ms
page.js
20 ms
count.js
128 ms
widgets.js
17 ms
collect
114 ms
hovercard.css
30 ms
services.css
90 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
46 ms
sm13.html
57 ms
g.gif
30 ms
icons.15.svg.css
66 ms
syndication
104 ms
596201119048564737
293 ms
ga.js
41 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
2 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
5 ms
Kp4_IVXf_normal.png
123 ms
Cd9U9a7UUAAjVul.jpg
178 ms
jot
23 ms
rockchalkblog.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rockchalkblog.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
rockchalkblog.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rockchalkblog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rockchalkblog.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rockchalkblog.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rock Chalk Blog. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: