1.8 sec in total
280 ms
1.4 sec
172 ms
Welcome to roclips.com homepage info - get ready to check ROCLIPS best content right away, or after learning these important things about roclips.com
Visit roclips.comWe analyzed Roclips.com page load time and found that the first response time was 280 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
roclips.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
12/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value6.8 s
34/100
10%
Value1,230 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.748
6/100
15%
Value12.4 s
15/100
10%
280 ms
327 ms
9 ms
14 ms
14 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Roclips.com, 41% (35 requests) were made to Roclip.com and 14% (12 requests) were made to I.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (327 ms) relates to the external source Roclip.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.5 MB (66%)
3.7 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Roclips.com main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ROCLIPS images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Roclips.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (59%)
70
29
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ROCLIPS. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
roclips.com
280 ms
roclip.com
327 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
9 ms
css
14 ms
cuteslider.css
14 ms
styles.css
16 ms
bootstrap.min.css
25 ms
style.css
15 ms
template.css
37 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
16 ms
zn_dynamic.css
20 ms
zn_pb_css.css
22 ms
cute.slider.js
34 ms
cute.transitions.all.js
21 ms
respond.min.js
33 ms
jquery.js
68 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
31 ms
bootstrap.min.js
31 ms
modernizr.js
34 ms
youmax_block.min.css
33 ms
jquery.form.min.js
34 ms
scripts.js
108 ms
plugins.js
108 ms
smoothscroll.js
110 ms
znscript.js
110 ms
wp-embed.min.js
109 ms
youmax.cc.js
110 ms
btn_donateCC_LG.gif
79 ms
css
78 ms
css
92 ms
pixel.gif
89 ms
logo-main.png
51 ms
radio4ro.jpg
188 ms
crestin.gif
191 ms
intercer.jpg
189 ms
kerigmaro.jpg
189 ms
pasiro.jpg
189 ms
logo-main.png
189 ms
youmax_block.min.css
79 ms
font-awesome.min.css
87 ms
translation.json
70 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
71 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
14 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
36 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
36 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
36 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
36 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
37 ms
BYPM-GE291ZjIXBWrtCwetIZ6OFpBzzPr7LueGMiD8k.ttf
37 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
37 ms
kl-social-icons.woff
36 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
35 ms
client:platform.js
89 ms
playlistItems
164 ms
channels
246 ms
Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsDR-eWpsHSw83BRsAQElGgc.ttf
26 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
20 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
4 ms
postmessageRelay
59 ms
mqdefault.jpg
165 ms
videos
111 ms
mqdefault.jpg
175 ms
mqdefault.jpg
182 ms
mqdefault.jpg
195 ms
mqdefault.jpg
197 ms
mqdefault.jpg
187 ms
mqdefault.jpg
182 ms
mqdefault.jpg
202 ms
mqdefault.jpg
197 ms
mqdefault.jpg
202 ms
mqdefault.jpg
204 ms
mqdefault.jpg
222 ms
971028622-postmessagerelay.js
32 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
26 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
3 ms
photo.jpg
66 ms
platform.js
27 ms
LsZJl3wrU64jbhfZ4wvrjf39apdHeMdAmu9955vcCaRKXuk3ON_SE5bII-lT6IUdz_qh5A8pTh4=w1060-fcrop64=1,00005a57ffffa5a8-nd-c0xffffffff-rj-k-no
87 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
11 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_2
14 ms
subscribe_embed
69 ms
www-subscribe-embed-vfltcNtU0.css
7 ms
www-subscribe-embed.js
6 ms
www-hitchhiker-vfl-Nn88d.png
53 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
21 ms
roclips.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
roclips.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
roclips.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Roclips.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Roclips.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
roclips.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ROCLIPS. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: