2.3 sec in total
428 ms
1.5 sec
332 ms
Visit rollingsquare.net now to see the best up-to-date Rolling Square content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rollingsquare.net
Rolling Square is the platform where I share all the kickass stuff I find, experience, learn and create on the web.
Visit rollingsquare.netWe analyzed Rollingsquare.net page load time and found that the first response time was 428 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
rollingsquare.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0.8 s
100/100
25%
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.7 s
100/100
10%
428 ms
47 ms
85 ms
98 ms
109 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Rollingsquare.net, 12% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (942 ms) belongs to the original domain Rollingsquare.net.
Page size can be reduced by 213.6 kB (47%)
457.7 kB
244.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Rollingsquare.net main page is 457.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 200.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.4 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rolling Square images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 95.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 95.5 kB or 48% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 88.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rollingsquare.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 88.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (75%)
32
8
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rolling Square. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rollingsquare.net
428 ms
style.css
47 ms
css
85 ms
css
98 ms
css
109 ms
jetpack.css
57 ms
jquery.js
62 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
56 ms
jquery.min.js
95 ms
photon.js
26 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
155 ms
gprofiles.js
69 ms
wpgroho.js
34 ms
wp-embed.min.js
34 ms
e-201609.js
24 ms
wordpress.css
37 ms
misc.css
34 ms
comments.css
35 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
112 ms
ga.js
105 ms
three-years-of-rolling-square.png
401 ms
bsg.png
873 ms
close.gif
56 ms
dots.gif
55 ms
rs5.png
57 ms
search.gif
57 ms
menu.gif
57 ms
editor.png
57 ms
thumbnail.jpg
59 ms
prev2.png
942 ms
next2.png
942 ms
void-ad.gif
57 ms
hovercard.css
141 ms
services.css
142 ms
mrl8jkM18OlOQN8JLgasD9Hq-FFgoDNV3GTKpHwuvtI.woff
154 ms
leqv3v-yTsJNC7nFznSMqbIHYkLmgtPJP77jcqN9P08.woff
164 ms
leqv3v-yTsJNC7nFznSMqcVNtom4QlEDNJaqqqzqdSs.woff
182 ms
leqv3v-yTsJNC7nFznSMqSmgpmuQqK2I-L2S9cF65Ek.woff
195 ms
leqv3v-yTsJNC7nFznSMqYqjGYJUyOXcBwUQbRaNH6c.woff
194 ms
g.gif
135 ms
__utm.gif
75 ms
rollingsquare.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
rollingsquare.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rollingsquare.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rollingsquare.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Rollingsquare.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rollingsquare.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rolling Square. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: