7.9 sec in total
151 ms
7.5 sec
229 ms
Visit rollingstoneconstruction.com now to see the best up-to-date Rollingstoneconstruction content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rollingstoneconstruction.com
Rollingstone Construction
Visit rollingstoneconstruction.comWe analyzed Rollingstoneconstruction.com page load time and found that the first response time was 151 ms and then it took 7.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
rollingstoneconstruction.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value4.4 s
40/100
25%
Value14.8 s
1/100
10%
Value160 ms
94/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value16.5 s
5/100
10%
151 ms
5850 ms
195 ms
206 ms
191 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Rollingstoneconstruction.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Rollingstoneconstruction.com.
Page size can be reduced by 237.7 kB (5%)
5.1 MB
4.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Rollingstoneconstruction.com main page is 5.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 184.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rollingstoneconstruction images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 717 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rollingstoneconstruction.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (39%)
56
34
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rollingstoneconstruction. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rollingstoneconstruction.com
151 ms
rollingstoneconstruction.com
5850 ms
bootstrap.min.css
195 ms
font-awesome.min.css
206 ms
template.css
191 ms
default.css
188 ms
index.php
239 ms
sppagebuilder.css
211 ms
jquery.min.js
259 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
255 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
253 ms
cms.js
256 ms
caption.js
277 ms
popper.min.js
303 ms
bootstrap.min.js
383 ms
main.js
314 ms
jquery.min.js
24 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-5.6.2.js
338 ms
sppagebuilder.js
319 ms
smartslider.min.css
337 ms
n2-jquery.min.js
374 ms
nextend-gsap.min.js
380 ms
nextend-frontend.min.js
428 ms
smartslider-frontend.min.js
525 ms
smartslider-simple-type-frontend.min.js
443 ms
powr_joomla.js
61 ms
rollingstone-construction-logo-1.png
169 ms
banner_nuevo-1.jpg
602 ms
banner_nuevo-2.jpg
568 ms
banner_nuevo-3.jpg
371 ms
banner_nuevo-4.jpg
657 ms
banner_nuevo-5.jpg
388 ms
banner_nuevo-6.jpg
659 ms
banner_nuevo-7.jpg
548 ms
banner_nuevo-8.jpg
572 ms
banner_nuevo-9.jpg
667 ms
3.png
634 ms
1.png
636 ms
3-1.png
669 ms
slide2-2.jpg
949 ms
slide3-3.jpg
788 ms
client6_200x200_exact_images.png
745 ms
lubys_200x200_exact_images.png
744 ms
client5_200x200_exact_images.png
745 ms
client2_200x200_exact_images.png
744 ms
Pi-Pizzaeria_200x200_exact_images.jpg
806 ms
client3-2_200x200_exact_images.png
805 ms
pilates_200x200_exact_images.png
807 ms
client1_200x200_exact_images.png
802 ms
brio_200x200_exact_images.png
847 ms
TGI-Fridays_200x200_exact_images.png
862 ms
Brenners_200x200_exact_images.jpg
865 ms
client4_200x200_exact_images.png
864 ms
11.png
866 ms
2.png
912 ms
32.png
927 ms
left.png
828 ms
right.png
828 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
826 ms
rollingstoneconstruction.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
rollingstoneconstruction.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
rollingstoneconstruction.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rollingstoneconstruction.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rollingstoneconstruction.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rollingstoneconstruction.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rollingstoneconstruction. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: