2.1 sec in total
164 ms
1.7 sec
171 ms
Welcome to rosemarycounter.com homepage info - get ready to check Rosemary Counter best content right away, or after learning these important things about rosemarycounter.com
Rosemary Counter is a Toronto-based writer and reviewer (and sometimes-editor).
Visit rosemarycounter.comWe analyzed Rosemarycounter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 164 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
rosemarycounter.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
77/100
10%
Value2.2 s
94/100
25%
Value6.2 s
43/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.209
59/100
15%
Value3.0 s
96/100
10%
164 ms
733 ms
69 ms
226 ms
357 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Rosemarycounter.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (733 ms) belongs to the original domain Rosemarycounter.com.
Page size can be reduced by 49.9 kB (12%)
413.5 kB
363.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Rosemarycounter.com main page is 413.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 327.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rosemary Counter images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 210 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rosemarycounter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.8 kB or 13% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (33%)
24
16
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rosemary Counter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rosemarycounter.com
164 ms
rosemarycounter.com
733 ms
foundation.css
69 ms
style.css
226 ms
custom.modernizr.js
357 ms
style.min.css
7 ms
addthis_wordpress_public.min.css
6 ms
admin-ajax.php
556 ms
addthis_widget.js
44 ms
foundation.min.js
365 ms
comment_count.js
226 ms
stylesheet.css
58 ms
logo.png
57 ms
icon_about.png
58 ms
icon_clips.png
58 ms
icon_book.png
58 ms
icon_blog.png
59 ms
icon_contact.png
61 ms
Rosemary22-copy.jpg
112 ms
Zoomer-238x324.png
220 ms
Alice-112x137.png
79 ms
State-of-Terror-112x137.png
282 ms
MomShame-112x137.png
280 ms
rosemary-counter.jpg
62 ms
logo_copyright.png
64 ms
zepto.js
161 ms
Quicksand_Book-webfont.woff
22 ms
Quicksand_Bold-webfont.woff
25 ms
Quicksand_Book_Oblique-webfont.woff
37 ms
count.js
20 ms
ga.js
24 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
rosemarycounter.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
rosemarycounter.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
rosemarycounter.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rosemarycounter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rosemarycounter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rosemarycounter.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rosemary Counter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: