Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

rotheblog.com

Classic Arcade Games Blog (Pac-man, Galaga, Mr. Do!) - Rotheblog

Page Load Speed

39.3 sec in total

First Response

11.6 sec

Resources Loaded

23.3 sec

Page Rendered

4.4 sec

rotheblog.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rotheblog content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rotheblog.com

Welcome to Rotheblog - A Classic Arcade Games Blog about Reproduction Arcade Artwork, Arcade News, and Wordpress Tips based in Indianapolis, Indiana.

Visit rotheblog.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rotheblog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 11.6 sec and then it took 27.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rotheblog.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

34/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value700 ms

43/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.015

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.7 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.rotheblog.com

11561 ms

457 ms

253 ms

shareaholic.js

31 ms

251 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Rotheblog.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Dsms0mj1bbhn4.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (11.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Rotheblog.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 959.0 kB (63%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

560.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Rotheblog.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 23.4 kB

  • Original 32.7 kB
  • After minification 32.6 kB
  • After compression 9.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.4 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 101.6 kB

  • Original 272.0 kB
  • After minification 170.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rotheblog needs image optimization as it can save up to 101.6 kB or 37% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 834.0 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 380.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 834.0 kB or 69% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (60%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

19

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rotheblog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rotheblog.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

rotheblog.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rotheblog.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rotheblog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rotheblog.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rotheblog. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: