749 ms in total
171 ms
412 ms
166 ms
Visit routingtool.com now to see the best up-to-date Routing Tool content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about routingtool.com
routing number verification and bank routing numbers bank search tool that finds any valid routing number in the database plus RTN Routing number algorithm check to validate funds and check guarantee.
Visit routingtool.comWe analyzed Routingtool.com page load time and found that the first response time was 171 ms and then it took 578 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
routingtool.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value3.5 s
65/100
25%
Value3.2 s
92/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.415
23/100
15%
Value3.6 s
91/100
10%
171 ms
96 ms
33 ms
103 ms
87 ms
Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Routingtool.com, 89% (17 requests) were made to Yourfavorite.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (171 ms) belongs to the original domain Routingtool.com.
Page size can be reduced by 27.8 kB (41%)
67.2 kB
39.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Routingtool.com main page is 67.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 39.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Routing Tool needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.2 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 230 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Routingtool.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 230 B or 61% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
17
17
The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Routing Tool. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
routingtool.com
171 ms
routingtool.css
96 ms
900.jpg
33 ms
top_banner.gif
103 ms
symbol.gif
87 ms
verify.gif
64 ms
bullet_boxes.gif
67 ms
tool_button1.gif
46 ms
tool_button2.gif
65 ms
tool_button3.gif
67 ms
spacer_white.gif
84 ms
numbers.gif
87 ms
fortune500.gif
88 ms
checkwriter-06.gif
88 ms
routingtool.gif
127 ms
bettercheck.jpg
151 ms
tool_button1_over.gif
22 ms
tool_button2_over.gif
23 ms
tool_button3_over.gif
24 ms
routingtool.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
routingtool.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
routingtool.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
WINDOWS-1252
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Routingtool.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Routingtool.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
routingtool.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Routing Tool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: