4.1 sec in total
164 ms
2.9 sec
1 sec
Click here to check amazing Rove content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rove.me
Rove.me - A travel guide that suggests you the best time to visit a destination based on experiences it offers.
Visit rove.meWe analyzed Rove.me page load time and found that the first response time was 164 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
rove.me performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
87/100
10%
Value11.3 s
0/100
25%
Value4.4 s
74/100
10%
Value2,320 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.886
3/100
15%
Value10.3 s
25/100
10%
164 ms
1241 ms
244 ms
53 ms
275 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Rove.me, 56% (43 requests) were made to Res.cloudinary.com and 17% (13 requests) were made to Roveme.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Rove.me.
Page size can be reduced by 507.9 kB (12%)
4.2 MB
3.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Rove.me main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 348.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 348.0 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rove images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 72.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 72.9 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 78.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rove.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 78.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (41%)
66
39
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rove. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
rove.me
164 ms
rove.me
1241 ms
main.css
244 ms
mapbox.css
53 ms
r3idoxhohpb2ktjw4irj.png
275 ms
o9byznhky2zqtumxen3y.png
336 ms
uz3fnp75keiqwfymbo5x.png
260 ms
yn0vc0c9jhew3awbyd1f.png
264 ms
o06y4vwjsw9lj9epyt5z.png
262 ms
piunkl3hfrhxeap6h5gz.png
329 ms
calf4o3dxu1zv6jodzxc.png
338 ms
jwe6qtcns3r4epla131e.png
359 ms
wj6vm24xcdgajxbpfapz.png
332 ms
yvdttgtvfoktmfgluvau.png
337 ms
nyk4ozz7vwfc8fbguouj.png
366 ms
lkwyetbtukvpjvtd6hd0.png
599 ms
w9ioq1o8l6j9wmmdlbmk.png
598 ms
core.min.js
252 ms
stickyfill.min.js
350 ms
require.js
351 ms
gwl8ygd.js
492 ms
lno2divzxpv4npzbufia
491 ms
lno2divzxpv4npzbufia
506 ms
rw7g7x9um1oqvbrtyjei
500 ms
rw7g7x9um1oqvbrtyjei
495 ms
gsrbilhnpzg5eu9r0hke
571 ms
gsrbilhnpzg5eu9r0hke
1193 ms
yrecupc1ixyjbgcqewa1
570 ms
yrecupc1ixyjbgcqewa1
564 ms
JC41M7RPSec
614 ms
JC41M7RPSec
566 ms
wv8ckqiqqan7yjbr42zc
658 ms
wv8ckqiqqan7yjbr42zc
710 ms
wttvd1d0jjn9bwloxzgu
678 ms
wttvd1d0jjn9bwloxzgu
620 ms
kndqttiliytzkmwbjeun
832 ms
kndqttiliytzkmwbjeun
724 ms
i7pakbpafchjbo6z7aiz
829 ms
i7pakbpafchjbo6z7aiz
825 ms
v5znn7zgygdckirgxiy0
834 ms
v5znn7zgygdckirgxiy0
823 ms
gw455tao9ng8cvagx8jn
1187 ms
gw455tao9ng8cvagx8jn
1184 ms
mvipy0i3wfpjqholiqrp
1191 ms
logo.svg
86 ms
checkbox_checked.svg
263 ms
mvipy0i3wfpjqholiqrp
1035 ms
r4ydefjnzlpyjbb98np7
1046 ms
r4ydefjnzlpyjbb98np7
1037 ms
jmhmfz5nezjglfgdsmy1
1172 ms
jmhmfz5nezjglfgdsmy1
1057 ms
hiwduu077lfateniir9s
1106 ms
hiwduu077lfateniir9s
1163 ms
app.frontend.js
12 ms
analytics.js
73 ms
DestinationList.js
57 ms
d
182 ms
ReasonsGrid.js
55 ms
NewDestinations.js
58 ms
Intro.js
62 ms
GridGenerator.js
39 ms
collect
28 ms
collect
49 ms
countries.json
143 ms
ga-audiences
127 ms
xewjOWqK1RVxApWsorVrGEt6yhmPRsoYSOb2EwpWyhjK9soZzs72EmFym4lVexmD3vZx34OcJBDVHOYIxzlGMc5wUlOUcNpznCWc5znAhe5xGWucJVarvnzelNtwG2V2jvUc5d73OcBDTTykEc85glPecZzXvCSJl7xmje8pZl3fwGIxZ6cAAAA
19 ms
xewjOWqK1RVxApWsorVrGEt6yhmPRsoYSOb2EwpWyhjK9soZzs72EmFym4lVexmD3vZx34OcJBDVHOYIxzlGMc5wUlOUcNpznCWc5znAhe5xGWucJVarvnzelNtwG2V2jvUc5d73OcBDTTykEc85glPecZzXvCSJl7xmje8pZl3fwGIxZ6cAAAA
18 ms
AYjFnpwAAAA=
19 ms
m1mC1vZxnZ2sJNd7GYPe9nHfg5wkEMc5ghHORbwOZvjnOAkpzjNGc6SI86f4zwXyOUieeRLcv9v7D+xsd8BLbkl8g==
18 ms
edH4Fi9YVsgAA
16 ms
LEYAAAA=
17 ms
njxu
16 ms
p.gif
374 ms
sdk.js
114 ms
client.js
93 ms
117 ms
xd_arbiter.php
40 ms
rove.me accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rove.me best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rove.me SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rove.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rove.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rove.me
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rove. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: