Tools & Wizards About Us
royalbay.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

royalbay.co.uk

Care Homes West Sussex, Nursing Homes Worcestershire, Retirement Homes Dorset, Residential Care Homes Northamptonshire, Assured Retirement Living Suss...

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

35 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

622 ms

royalbay.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit royalbay.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Royal Bay content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about royalbay.co.uk

Top quality residential care homes, nursing homes and retirement properties in Dorset, West Sussex, Northamptonshire and Worcestershire from Royal Bay. Enjoy assured retirement living from the experts...

Visit royalbay.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Royalbay.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 35 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

royalbay.co.uk performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

62/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,500 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.203

61/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.8 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

royalbay.co.uk

35 ms

frontend.css

14 ms

styles.css

16 ms

uaf.css

19 ms

style.css

9 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Royalbay.co.uk, 9% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Royalbay.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 305.2 kB (5%)

Content Size

6.2 MB

After Optimization

5.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Royalbay.co.uk main page is 6.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 257.0 kB

  • Original 299.1 kB
  • After minification 296.3 kB
  • After compression 42.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 257.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 12.7 kB

  • Original 5.7 MB
  • After minification 5.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Royal Bay images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 33.9 kB

  • Original 283.2 kB
  • After minification 283.2 kB
  • After compression 249.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 33.9 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 8.9 kB
  • After minification 8.7 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Royalbay.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (68%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Royal Bay. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

royalbay.co.uk

royalbay.co.uk

35 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

14 ms

styles.css

styles.css

16 ms

uaf.css

uaf.css

19 ms

style.css

style.css

9 ms

js

js

199 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

39 ms

et-core-unified-2.min.css

et-core-unified-2.min.css

8 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

20 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

20 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

25 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

25 ms

index.js

index.js

26 ms

index.js

index.js

26 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

30 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

27 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

32 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

27 ms

easypiechart.js

easypiechart.js

28 ms

salvattore.js

salvattore.js

29 ms

common.js

common.js

30 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

33 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

31 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

32 ms

fb.js

fb.js

32 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

34 ms

royal-bay-care-home-ltd.jpg

royal-bay-care-home-ltd.jpg

131 ms

embed

embed

288 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

76 ms

royal-bay-care-homes-ltd.jpg

royal-bay-care-homes-ltd.jpg

113 ms

345463466_169876989044542_570993057648520900_n.jpg

345463466_169876989044542_570993057648520900_n.jpg

770 ms

347227307_1030900731650703_5225539191478922715_n.jpg

347227307_1030900731650703_5225539191478922715_n.jpg

761 ms

347261656_756130136519409_4649081627834251812_n.jpg

347261656_756130136519409_4649081627834251812_n.jpg

769 ms

347266664_756129533186136_7756612668893162555_n.jpg

347266664_756129533186136_7756612668893162555_n.jpg

708 ms

347419159_5944372482340123_825554221029550212_n.jpg

347419159_5944372482340123_825554221029550212_n.jpg

765 ms

royal-bay-care-homes.jpg

royal-bay-care-homes.jpg

875 ms

img-58-usical20Entertainment20-20Larks20Leas20Rest20Home1.jpg

img-58-usical20Entertainment20-20Larks20Leas20Rest20Home1.jpg

710 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

712 ms

4699Myriad-Pro-Regular.woff

4699Myriad-Pro-Regular.woff

1191 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

1044 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

50 ms

js

js

32 ms

search.js

search.js

5 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

8 ms

main.js

main.js

12 ms

Accessibility Review

royalbay.co.uk accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

royalbay.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

royalbay.co.uk SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Royalbay.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Royalbay.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

royalbay.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Royal Bay. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: