2.4 sec in total
396 ms
1.6 sec
419 ms
Click here to check amazing Royal Estate S content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about royalestates.ae
Visit royalestates.aeWe analyzed Royalestates.ae page load time and found that the first response time was 396 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
royalestates.ae performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.5 s
0/100
10%
Value24.4 s
0/100
25%
Value18.2 s
0/100
10%
Value1,040 ms
26/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value24.9 s
0/100
10%
396 ms
373 ms
298 ms
150 ms
151 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Royalestates.ae, 26% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Royalestates.ae.
Page size can be reduced by 686.3 kB (31%)
2.2 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Royalestates.ae main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 57.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Royal Estate S images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 349.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 349.6 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 265.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Royalestates.ae needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 265.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (60%)
48
19
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Royal Estate S. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
royalestates.ae
396 ms
bootstrap.css
373 ms
settings.css
298 ms
prettify.css
150 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
151 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css
152 ms
style.css
386 ms
aqua.css
224 ms
css
24 ms
css
37 ms
css
45 ms
fontello.css
299 ms
budicons.css
301 ms
jquery.min.js
523 ms
bootstrap.min.js
383 ms
twitter-bootstrap-hover-dropdown.min.js
383 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
595 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
518 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
455 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
455 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
455 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
559 ms
jquery.easytabs.min.js
560 ms
idangerous.swiper-2.1.min.js
557 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
647 ms
jquery.sticky.js
661 ms
prettify.js
662 ms
jquery.slickforms.js
662 ms
instafeed.min.js
663 ms
jquery.dcflickr.1.0.js
672 ms
retina.js
671 ms
classie.js
674 ms
scripts.js
674 ms
logo.png
783 ms
Website_Banner1-01.jpg
969 ms
Website_Banner1-02.jpg
1037 ms
Website_Banner1-03.jpg
965 ms
slider-bg3.jpg
1039 ms
p1.jpg
788 ms
p2.jpg
788 ms
p3.jpg
752 ms
p4.jpg
686 ms
p5.jpg
845 ms
p6.jpg
828 ms
p7.jpg
747 ms
p8.jpg
747 ms
p9.jpg
748 ms
p10.jpg
737 ms
timer.png
724 ms
Gold-bg.jpg
796 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
11 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
14 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
13 ms
Jzo62I39jc0gQRrbndN6nfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
13 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
13 ms
mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
13 ms
dazS1PrQQuCxC3iOAJFEJZ_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
15 ms
y7lebkjgREBJK96VQi37Zp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
29 ms
dazS1PrQQuCxC3iOAJFEJbfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf
16 ms
MEz38VLIFL-t46JUtkIEgH4UHu-c0cTZKOwO_f6u1Os.ttf
29 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nDokq8qT6AIiNJ07Vf_NrVA.ttf
15 ms
Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsDR-eWpsHSw83BRsAQElGgc.ttf
28 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nL3QFSXBldIn45k5A7iXhnc.ttf
28 ms
fontello.woff
753 ms
OLffGBTaF0XFOW1gnuHF0Z0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
30 ms
W4wDsBUluyw0tK3tykhXEfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
28 ms
7m8l7TlFO-S3VkhHuR0at50EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
29 ms
12mE4jfMSBTmg-81EiS-YS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
30 ms
t6Nd4cfPRhZP44Q5QAjcC50EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
28 ms
bmC0pGMXrhphrZJmniIZpZ0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
29 ms
analytics.js
109 ms
collect
20 ms
royalestates.ae accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
royalestates.ae best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
royalestates.ae SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Royalestates.ae can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Royalestates.ae main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
royalestates.ae
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Royal Estate S. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: