Tools & Wizards About Us
royalsocietypublishing.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    48% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

royalsocietypublishing.org

Journals | Royal Society

Page Load Speed

5.6 sec in total

First Response

216 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

985 ms

royalsocietypublishing.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to royalsocietypublishing.org homepage info - get ready to check Royal Society Publishing best content for China right away, or after learning these important things about royalsocietypublishing.org

Our international, peer reviewed journals publish high quality science and provide an excellent service to our authors and readers.

Visit royalsocietypublishing.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Royalsocietypublishing.org page load time and found that the first response time was 216 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

royalsocietypublishing.org performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value38.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value850 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.3 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

royalsocietypublishing.org

216 ms

journals

367 ms

303 ms

headCss

165 ms

WebResource.axd

253 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Royalsocietypublishing.org, 84% (32 requests) were made to Royalsociety.org and 5% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Royalsociety.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 222.5 kB (22%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

782.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Royalsocietypublishing.org main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 777.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 82.8 kB

  • Original 123.2 kB
  • After minification 93.3 kB
  • After compression 40.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 29.8 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.8 kB or 67% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 98.6 kB

  • Original 777.3 kB
  • After minification 678.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Royal Society Publishing needs image optimization as it can save up to 98.6 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 41.0 kB

  • Original 104.4 kB
  • After minification 88.4 kB
  • After compression 63.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 41.0 kB or 39% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (27%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Royal Society Publishing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

royalsocietypublishing.org

royalsocietypublishing.org

216 ms

journals

journals

367 ms

303 ms

headCss

headCss

165 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

253 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

175 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

62 ms

angular.min.js

angular.min.js

102 ms

bodyJs

bodyJs

630 ms

bodyCustomJs

bodyCustomJs

653 ms

bodyAngularJs

bodyAngularJs

650 ms

logo.png

logo.png

306 ms

e56ecb6d-da41-4bd9-982d-2d295bec9ab0.woff

e56ecb6d-da41-4bd9-982d-2d295bec9ab0.woff

126 ms

2fa30669-9bbd-4ced-912f-db94a367ed6c.woff

2fa30669-9bbd-4ced-912f-db94a367ed6c.woff

797 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

114 ms

d999c07b-a049-4eb5-b8a6-4f36ae25e67e.woff

d999c07b-a049-4eb5-b8a6-4f36ae25e67e.woff

793 ms

70ae52ec-d89b-4c6a-9402-854ebe423c54.woff

70ae52ec-d89b-4c6a-9402-854ebe423c54.woff

748 ms

trackingCode.js

trackingCode.js

1365 ms

ORCID%20story%20image.png

ORCID%20story%20image.png

1703 ms

proc-a.jpg

proc-a.jpg

1383 ms

Phil_Trans_B.jpg

Phil_Trans_B.jpg

1489 ms

Proc_B.jpg

Proc_B.jpg

1383 ms

Open_Bio.jpg

Open_Bio.jpg

1700 ms

Bio_Lett.jpg

Bio_Lett.jpg

1504 ms

phil-trans-a.jpg

phil-trans-a.jpg

1504 ms

Proc_A.jpg

Proc_A.jpg

1504 ms

Interface.jpg

Interface.jpg

1699 ms

interface-focus.jpg

interface-focus.jpg

1699 ms

notes-records.jpg

notes-records.jpg

1699 ms

bio-mems.jpg

bio-mems.jpg

1711 ms

unexpected.jpg

unexpected.jpg

1712 ms

2055.jpg

2055.jpg

1684 ms

rs-crest-footer.png

rs-crest-footer.png

1671 ms

logo-footer.png

logo-footer.png

1670 ms

rs-crest-nav.png

rs-crest-nav.png

1684 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

834 ms

collect

collect

118 ms

headPrintCss

headPrintCss

87 ms

Accessibility Review

royalsocietypublishing.org accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

royalsocietypublishing.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

royalsocietypublishing.org SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Royalsocietypublishing.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Royalsocietypublishing.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

royalsocietypublishing.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Royal Society Publishing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: