Tools & Wizards About Us
royaltag.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

royaltag.net

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

1.8 sec

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

220 ms

royaltag.net screenshot

About Website

Visit royaltag.net now to see the best up-to-date Royaltag content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about royaltag.net

Royal Tag is your single-source e solutions provider, whatever your project requirements or budget we can help you design and execute high

Visit royaltag.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Royaltag.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

royaltag.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

royaltag.net

1801 ms

style.css

83 ms

960.css

114 ms

css

26 ms

style.css

112 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Royaltag.net, 11% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 11% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Royaltag.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 154.0 kB (55%)

Content Size

281.1 kB

After Optimization

127.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Royaltag.net main page is 281.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 161.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 11.5 kB

  • Original 15.6 kB
  • After minification 14.0 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 6.0 kB

  • Original 63.7 kB
  • After minification 57.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Royaltag images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 101.9 kB

  • Original 161.6 kB
  • After minification 161.3 kB
  • After compression 59.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 101.9 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 34.6 kB

  • Original 40.2 kB
  • After minification 24.5 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Royaltag.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (44%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Royaltag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

royaltag.net

royaltag.net

1801 ms

style.css

style.css

83 ms

960.css

960.css

114 ms

css

css

26 ms

style.css

style.css

112 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

197 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

158 ms

superfish-combine.min.js

superfish-combine.min.js

152 ms

common.js

common.js

157 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

44 ms

bg-pattern.png

bg-pattern.png

87 ms

1-700x326.jpg

1-700x326.jpg

144 ms

zoom.jpg

zoom.jpg

78 ms

googleplus.png

googleplus.png

98 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

96 ms

feed.png

feed.png

81 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

12 ms

gQ0PT3rPU_Et2ExNz-ahmqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

gQ0PT3rPU_Et2ExNz-ahmqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

12 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

SEO Factors

royaltag.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Royaltag.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Royaltag.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

royaltag.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Royaltag. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: