20 sec in total
9.4 sec
10 sec
550 ms
Visit royaltyline.org now to see the best up-to-date Royalty Line content for Iran and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about royaltyline.org
Visit royaltyline.orgWe analyzed Royaltyline.org page load time and found that the first response time was 9.4 sec and then it took 10.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
royaltyline.org performance score
9438 ms
628 ms
421 ms
419 ms
422 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Royaltyline.org, 3% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Parspal.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Royaltyline.org.
Page size can be reduced by 593.9 kB (22%)
2.7 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Royaltyline.org main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 117.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 117.9 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 153.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Royalty Line images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 228.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 228.2 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 94.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Royaltyline.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 94.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (41%)
70
41
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Royalty Line. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
royaltyline.org
9438 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
628 ms
cuteslider.css
421 ms
styles.css
419 ms
styles-rtl.css
422 ms
colorbox.css
421 ms
widget.css
630 ms
style.css
837 ms
woocommerce.css
1050 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
840 ms
responsive.css
834 ms
modernizr.min.js
10 ms
cute.slider.js
1250 ms
cute.transitions.all.js
1048 ms
respond.min.js
7 ms
jquery.js
1662 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1058 ms
jquery-functions.js
1264 ms
logo_royaltyline3.png
422 ms
search.png
212 ms
%D8%B2%D8%B7%D8%B2%D8%B7%D8%B2.jpg
1048 ms
blank.png
214 ms
shadow.png
213 ms
rl-es2014c-red-faded-black1-300x300.jpg
627 ms
rl-es2014m-black-500x500-300x300.jpg
634 ms
download-17-300x282.jpg
425 ms
rl-es1014m-yellow-300x300.jpg
633 ms
8a6298d1fda5c9a0730007f5fa11429d2-300x300.jpg
635 ms
RL-SS1016C-660x33010.png
1253 ms
wfxtu9wzdgtp1-300x300.jpg
848 ms
135-300x300.jpg
844 ms
rl-ls1010c-silver-500x2503-300x300.jpg
846 ms
rl-9pcsfc-red-300x300.jpg
1057 ms
rl-hs1007c-burgundy-500px-300x300.jpg
1060 ms
slider-style.css
1036 ms
cute.canvas.module.js
1227 ms
saeidbaneh.jpg
2282 ms
1111111.jpg
2281 ms
slider_1.jpg
2297 ms
slider_3.jpg
2312 ms
slider_4.jpg
1672 ms
BYekan.woff
1885 ms
icomoon.woff
2104 ms
rl-16cg-300x300.jpg
2282 ms
rl-fm8-300x300.jpg
2166 ms
rl-bs1009c-red-500px-300x300.jpg
2050 ms
rl-pc6l1-300x300.jpg
1965 ms
rl-1201c-300x300.jpg
1758 ms
1.jpg
1606 ms
controls.png
1667 ms
loading.gif
1669 ms
trans.png
1684 ms
select.png
1707 ms
dinar.eot
1669 ms
rl-sp7-300x300.jpg
1675 ms
rl-1231c-300x300.jpg
1558 ms
logo.aspx
754 ms
dot.png
895 ms
logo_royaltyline3.png
912 ms
386 ms
08.png
377 ms
logo.aspx
1168 ms
jquery.form.min.js
225 ms
scripts.js
416 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
416 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
417 ms
woocommerce.min.js
420 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
434 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
585 ms
woocompare.js
582 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
598 ms
wp-embed.min.js
617 ms
dinar.otf
724 ms
widget_v2.134.js
15 ms
__$$__stringtable_lang_fa.js
12 ms
royaltyline.org SEO score
FA
FA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Royaltyline.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Persian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Royaltyline.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
royaltyline.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Royalty Line. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: