11.3 sec in total
4.5 sec
6.5 sec
234 ms
Welcome to rprocess.net homepage info - get ready to check RProcess best content right away, or after learning these important things about rprocess.net
rProcess Outsourcing Services Pvt. Ltd is a highly specialized service provider. rProcess helps customers to accomplish operational excellence,.....
Visit rprocess.netWe analyzed Rprocess.net page load time and found that the first response time was 4.5 sec and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
rprocess.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value2.4 s
91/100
25%
Value2.4 s
98/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.032
100/100
15%
Value2.4 s
98/100
10%
4533 ms
24 ms
80 ms
77 ms
119 ms
Our browser made a total of 122 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Rprocess.net, 11% (13 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 7% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Rprocess.net.
Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (66%)
3.3 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Rprocess.net main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 80.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RProcess images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 788.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rprocess.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 788.4 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 77 (72%)
107
30
The browser has sent 107 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RProcess. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rprocess.net
4533 ms
ga.js
24 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
80 ms
display.css
77 ms
style.css
119 ms
css
25 ms
styles.css
85 ms
style2-os.css
149 ms
lightbox.css
151 ms
font-awesome.css
159 ms
font-awesome.min.css
163 ms
style.css
164 ms
owl.carousel.css
195 ms
settings.css
225 ms
css
37 ms
css
47 ms
load-posts.css
222 ms
css
46 ms
shortcodes.css
232 ms
skeleton.css
233 ms
camera.css
237 ms
skin.css
270 ms
flexslider.css
295 ms
blog.css
297 ms
prettyPhoto.css
306 ms
resize.css
311 ms
font-awesome.min.css
318 ms
retina.css
345 ms
animate.css
368 ms
component.css
373 ms
editor-style.css
380 ms
otw_shortcode.css
383 ms
jquery.js
428 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
417 ms
display.js
440 ms
wt_rmrh.js
445 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
455 ms
owl.carousel.js
496 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
534 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
542 ms
__utm.gif
10 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.min.js
443 ms
blog.js
444 ms
styles.css
445 ms
global.css
490 ms
bxslider.css
504 ms
font-awesome.min.css
469 ms
core.min.js
460 ms
datepicker.min.js
466 ms
comment-reply.min.js
460 ms
jquery.form.min.js
486 ms
scripts.js
500 ms
jquery.colorbox.js
480 ms
gallery-all.js
460 ms
jquery.hugeitmicro.min.js
464 ms
jquery.malihu.PageScroll2id.js
468 ms
jquery.malihu.PageScroll2id-init.js
491 ms
jQuerytools.js
503 ms
utils.js
557 ms
waypoints.min.js
462 ms
animated-contents.js
465 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
464 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
482 ms
smartbox.js
536 ms
jquery.tweet.js
482 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
471 ms
slider.js
473 ms
shortcodes.css
498 ms
ajax-loader.gif
57 ms
sprite.png
212 ms
header-shadow.png
104 ms
slider1.jpg
361 ms
slider-3.jpg
360 ms
slider-4.png
360 ms
default.png
359 ms
ajx_loading.gif
360 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
340 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
33 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
33 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
34 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
33 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
34 ms
maps
66 ms
OpenSans-Bold-webfont.woff
286 ms
embed
532 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
176 ms
loading.gif
52 ms
large_left.png
74 ms
large_right.png
76 ms
bx_loader.gif
76 ms
js
77 ms
init_embed.js
55 ms
common.js
43 ms
map.js
54 ms
google4.png
63 ms
overlay.js
28 ms
util.js
73 ms
onion.js
70 ms
search_impl.js
97 ms
StaticMapService.GetMapImage
189 ms
stats.js
66 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
42 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
51 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
85 ms
kh
119 ms
kh
166 ms
transparent.png
55 ms
controls.js
32 ms
vt
95 ms
vt
85 ms
vt
100 ms
vt
93 ms
vt
103 ms
css
86 ms
entity11.png
39 ms
mapcnt6.png
36 ms
tmapctrl.png
33 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
35 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
17 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
27 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
35 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
34 ms
rprocess.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rprocess.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
rprocess.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rprocess.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rprocess.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rprocess.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RProcess. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: