Tools & Wizards About Us
rpts.edu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 4

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

rpts.edu

Home | Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

155 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.6 sec

rpts.edu screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rpts content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rpts.edu

Our mission is to equip pastors for the ministry of the gospel of Jesus Christ, all within the framework of the historic Reformed faith.

Visit rpts.edu

Key Findings

We analyzed Rpts.edu page load time and found that the first response time was 155 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rpts.edu performance score

4

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value37.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.2 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30,450 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.772

5/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value39.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rpts.edu

155 ms

js

64 ms

css

58 ms

bootstrap.min.css

109 ms

font-awesome.css

106 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Rpts.edu, 18% (12 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 11% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Rpts.edu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.5 MB (27%)

Content Size

12.9 MB

After Optimization

9.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rpts.edu main page is 12.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 11.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 21.7 kB

  • Original 27.3 kB
  • After minification 18.9 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.4 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 2.7 MB

  • Original 11.9 MB
  • After minification 9.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rpts needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.7 MB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 244.3 kB

  • Original 411.3 kB
  • After minification 394.6 kB
  • After compression 167.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 244.3 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 482.2 kB

  • Original 580.8 kB
  • After minification 554.6 kB
  • After compression 98.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rpts.edu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 482.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (71%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rpts. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rpts.edu

rpts.edu

155 ms

js

js

64 ms

css

css

58 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

109 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

106 ms

linecons.css

linecons.css

86 ms

superslides.css

superslides.css

85 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

115 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

106 ms

reset.css

reset.css

117 ms

framework.css

framework.css

143 ms

typography.css

typography.css

143 ms

layout.css

layout.css

146 ms

blog.css

blog.css

141 ms

rpts.css

rpts.css

147 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

152 ms

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

233 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

185 ms

jquery.isotope.js

jquery.isotope.js

183 ms

masonry.js

masonry.js

184 ms

jquery.fitvids.min.js

jquery.fitvids.min.js

188 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

188 ms

jquery.superslides.min.js

jquery.superslides.min.js

188 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

196 ms

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js

293 ms

jquery.countTo.js

jquery.countTo.js

229 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

292 ms

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js

292 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

292 ms

rpts.js

rpts.js

292 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

36 ms

collect

collect

53 ms

xfGhy_J3Bjw

xfGhy_J3Bjw

126 ms

logo.png

logo.png

120 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

124 ms

down_alternate.png

down_alternate.png

122 ms

down_white.png

down_white.png

123 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

71 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

71 ms

base.js

base.js

70 ms

fetch-polyfill.js

fetch-polyfill.js

70 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

93 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

132 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

149 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

153 ms

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJabMl2xMB.ttf

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJabMl2xMB.ttf

173 ms

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJN7Ml2xMB.ttf

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJN7Ml2xMB.ttf

154 ms

ga.js

ga.js

88 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

2843 ms

xfGhy_J3Bjw

xfGhy_J3Bjw

108 ms

ga.js

ga.js

5 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

21 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

23 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

21 ms

base.js

base.js

85 ms

fetch-polyfill.js

fetch-polyfill.js

21 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

231 ms

Y-zeT9jJ33tCNYTX0Kw8-3I-ogsAM9wZgys9W8554e8.js

Y-zeT9jJ33tCNYTX0Kw8-3I-ogsAM9wZgys9W8554e8.js

158 ms

embed.js

embed.js

28 ms

id

id

60 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

15 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

15 ms

Create

Create

29 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

18 ms

log_event

log_event

30 ms

Accessibility Review

rpts.edu accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rpts.edu best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rpts.edu SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rpts.edu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rpts.edu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rpts.edu

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rpts. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: