Tools & Wizards About Us
rrbntpcresults2016.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

rrbntpcresults2016.com

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

51 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

183 ms

rrbntpcresults2016.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rrbntpcresults 2016 content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rrbntpcresults2016.com

RRB NTPC Result 2016,RRB NTPC Result,RRB Result 2016,RRB NTPC Results 2016,RRB NTPC 2016 Results,RRB NTPC Results,RRB NTPC Recruitment

Visit rrbntpcresults2016.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rrbntpcresults2016.com page load time and found that the first response time was 51 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rrbntpcresults2016.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

39/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,920 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.104

89/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.8 s

35/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rrbntpcresults2016.com

51 ms

www.rrbntpcresults2016.com

349 ms

3730162741-widget_css_bundle.css

34 ms

buttons.js

22 ms

jquery.min.js

22 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Rrbntpcresults2016.com, 12% (8 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com and 9% (6 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (509 ms) relates to the external source Cse.google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 624.1 kB (51%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

598.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rrbntpcresults2016.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 934.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 62.8 kB

  • Original 79.2 kB
  • After minification 77.9 kB
  • After compression 16.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 6.1 kB

  • Original 177.6 kB
  • After minification 171.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rrbntpcresults 2016 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 527.7 kB

  • Original 934.9 kB
  • After minification 934.7 kB
  • After compression 407.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 527.7 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 27.5 kB

  • Original 31.3 kB
  • After minification 22.9 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rrbntpcresults2016.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (67%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rrbntpcresults 2016. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rrbntpcresults2016.com

rrbntpcresults2016.com

51 ms

www.rrbntpcresults2016.com

www.rrbntpcresults2016.com

349 ms

3730162741-widget_css_bundle.css

3730162741-widget_css_bundle.css

34 ms

buttons.js

buttons.js

22 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

22 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

22 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

155 ms

arrow2.js

arrow2.js

244 ms

pagenavigation.txt.js

pagenavigation.txt.js

243 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

244 ms

4075021528-widgets.js

4075021528-widgets.js

107 ms

async-buttons.js

async-buttons.js

100 ms

pview

pview

189 ms

cse.js

cse.js

509 ms

icon18_wrench_allbkg.png

icon18_wrench_allbkg.png

233 ms

rrb%2Bntpc%2Bresult%2B2016.jpg

rrb%2Bntpc%2Bresult%2B2016.jpg

280 ms

RRB%2BNTPC%2BResult%2B2016%2B%2BRegion%2BWise.png

RRB%2BNTPC%2BResult%2B2016%2B%2BRegion%2BWise.png

273 ms

RRB%2BNTPC%2BResults%2B2016.png

RRB%2BNTPC%2BResults%2B2016.png

262 ms

rail_tracks-700x525.jpg

rail_tracks-700x525.jpg

262 ms

ca-pub-6924291154890936.js

ca-pub-6924291154890936.js

187 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

194 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

78 ms

authorization.css

authorization.css

135 ms

buttons.e80452d5e7cc382dad89d10f50bde247.css

buttons.e80452d5e7cc382dad89d10f50bde247.css

88 ms

ads

ads

306 ms

osd.js

osd.js

71 ms

likebox.php

likebox.php

117 ms

sc

sc

57 ms

ads

ads

198 ms

ads

ads

251 ms

blogger.js

blogger.js

200 ms

all.js

all.js

79 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

81 ms

summary

summary

75 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

19 ms

p.js

p.js

11 ms

t.dhj

t.dhj

110 ms

WRYTpCDr6V4.css

WRYTpCDr6V4.css

129 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

91 ms

arrow2-1.png

arrow2-1.png

194 ms

jot

jot

142 ms

29 ms

t.dhj

t.dhj

26 ms

abg.js

abg.js

44 ms

osd_listener.js

osd_listener.js

88 ms

0sTQzbapM8j.js

0sTQzbapM8j.js

64 ms

0sTQzbapM8j.js

0sTQzbapM8j.js

157 ms

collect

collect

20 ms

t_.js

t_.js

12 ms

external.min.js

external.min.js

38 ms

generic

generic

56 ms

googlelogo_dark_color_84x28dp.png

googlelogo_dark_color_84x28dp.png

83 ms

s

s

37 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

51 ms

m_window_focus_non_hydra.js

m_window_focus_non_hydra.js

62 ms

m_qs_click_protection.js

m_qs_click_protection.js

62 ms

11636516596597304531

11636516596597304531

61 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

62 ms

iconx2-000000.png

iconx2-000000.png

49 ms

pixel

pixel

62 ms

46 ms

tpid=CvQFClmvy5gAAAARLK9qAw%3D%3D

tpid=CvQFClmvy5gAAAARLK9qAw%3D%3D

43 ms

jsapi

jsapi

63 ms

ttd

ttd

29 ms

transparent.png

transparent.png

18 ms

cs

cs

16 ms

cs

cs

15 ms

8K3Zg6NpZGSge3qWJUIO0OW0x1SCW4IXoAiImY1mvc4.js

8K3Zg6NpZGSge3qWJUIO0OW0x1SCW4IXoAiImY1mvc4.js

9 ms

Accessibility Review

rrbntpcresults2016.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

rrbntpcresults2016.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rrbntpcresults2016.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rrbntpcresults2016.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Rrbntpcresults2016.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rrbntpcresults2016.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rrbntpcresults 2016. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: