1.6 sec in total
114 ms
1 sec
502 ms
Welcome to rtigger.com homepage info - get ready to check Rtigger best content right away, or after learning these important things about rtigger.com
欢迎访问秘 羞羞视频在线观看【rtigger.com】网站,羞羞网站在线观看入口免费一款无需登录就能在线观看各种羞羞的视频资源,羞羞的视频免费看这里汇聚各种精彩的海外作品供进来的老司机免费无限制点播。
Visit rtigger.comWe analyzed Rtigger.com page load time and found that the first response time was 114 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
rtigger.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value4.2 s
44/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value900 ms
31/100
30%
Value0.082
94/100
15%
Value7.1 s
52/100
10%
114 ms
238 ms
174 ms
195 ms
124 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Rtigger.com, 24% (11 requests) were made to Public.slidesharecdn.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (312 ms) relates to the external source Api.github.com.
Page size can be reduced by 94.5 kB (36%)
262.9 kB
168.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Rtigger.com main page is 262.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 105.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.9 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rtigger images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 699 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 78.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rtigger.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 78.2 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (71%)
42
12
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rtigger. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rtigger.com
114 ms
screen.css
238 ms
modernizr-2.0.js
174 ms
ender.js
195 ms
octopress.js
124 ms
css
25 ms
css
37 ms
css
42 ms
jquery.min.js
35 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
83 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
183 ms
github.js
168 ms
ga.js
69 ms
35920576
261 ms
line-tile.png
43 ms
title.png
44 ms
noise.png
120 ms
me.jpg
145 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
25 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
25 ms
__utm.gif
53 ms
count.js
49 ms
widgets.js
47 ms
jXHR.js
39 ms
repos
312 ms
rss.png
30 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
20 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
19 ms
combined_jquery.js
19 ms
global.js
33 ms
combined_li_tracking.js
14 ms
font-awesome.css
10 ms
combined_presentation.css
14 ms
combined_player_presentation.js
46 ms
combined_old_embed.js
69 ms
beacon.js
138 ms
you-cant-buy-agile-1-638.jpg
124 ms
35920576
112 ms
1x1.gif
109 ms
logo_embed_20x20_v1.png
107 ms
lead-form
129 ms
__utm.gif
40 ms
jot
201 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
51 ms
__utm.gif
26 ms
icons.svg
13 ms
rtigger.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rtigger.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
rtigger.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ZH
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rtigger.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rtigger.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rtigger.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rtigger. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: