Tools & Wizards About Us
rtoham.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 94

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

rtoham.com

RTO Electronics

Page Load Speed

898 ms in total

First Response

206 ms

Resources Loaded

590 ms

Page Rendered

102 ms

rtoham.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing RTO Ham content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rtoham.com

Ham radio sales and repair services

Visit rtoham.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rtoham.com page load time and found that the first response time was 206 ms and then it took 692 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rtoham.com performance score

94

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

78/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

86/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.068

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rtoham.com

206 ms

jquery.min.js

21 ms

cyclelite.js

76 ms

slideshow.js

148 ms

reset.css

158 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Rtoham.com, 18% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 12% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (229 ms) belongs to the original domain Rtoham.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 16.9 kB (12%)

Content Size

143.5 kB

After Optimization

126.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rtoham.com main page is 143.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 94.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 6.4 kB
  • After minification 5.6 kB
  • After compression 2.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 771 B, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.2 kB or 66% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 5.5 kB

  • Original 94.3 kB
  • After minification 88.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RTO Ham images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 33.5 kB
  • After minification 33.5 kB
  • After compression 33.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 7.2 kB

  • Original 9.3 kB
  • After minification 6.2 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rtoham.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (23%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RTO Ham. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rtoham.com

rtoham.com

206 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

21 ms

cyclelite.js

cyclelite.js

76 ms

slideshow.js

slideshow.js

148 ms

reset.css

reset.css

158 ms

styles.css

styles.css

157 ms

css

css

22 ms

logo.png

logo.png

76 ms

IMG_3014.JPG

IMG_3014.JPG

147 ms

IMG_2824_J05Feeb.JPG

IMG_2824_J05Feeb.JPG

78 ms

IMG_2774.JPG

IMG_2774.JPG

156 ms

IMG_3169.JPG

IMG_3169.JPG

227 ms

IMG_2534.JPG

IMG_2534.JPG

229 ms

css

css

35 ms

4UaHrEJCrhhnVA3DgluA96rp4Q.woff

4UaHrEJCrhhnVA3DgluA96rp4Q.woff

17 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

21 ms

1Ptgg87LROyAm3Kz-Ck.woff

1Ptgg87LROyAm3Kz-Ck.woff

23 ms

Accessibility Review

rtoham.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rtoham.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rtoham.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rtoham.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rtoham.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

rtoham.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RTO Ham. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: