Tools & Wizards About Us
rtu.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 56

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

rtu.ru

справочник предприятий России - RTU.ру, каталог фирм, каталог предприятий

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

613 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

364 ms

rtu.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing RTU content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rtu.ru

каталог предприятий РТУ.ру, каталог фирм, промышленные фирмы, информацию можно добавить бесплатно в справочник предприятий

Visit rtu.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Rtu.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 613 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rtu.ru performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

85/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,460 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.6 s

47/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rtu.ru

613 ms

style.css

193 ms

watch.js

1 ms

show_ads.js

16 ms

js_vert.php

467 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Rtu.ru, 8% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Musicmax.si.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 52.2 kB (29%)

Content Size

180.0 kB

After Optimization

127.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rtu.ru main page is 180.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 104.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 42.7 kB

  • Original 57.0 kB
  • After minification 56.6 kB
  • After compression 14.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.7 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 7.2 kB

  • Original 104.7 kB
  • After minification 97.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RTU images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 16.9 kB
  • After minification 16.8 kB
  • After compression 15.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 1.4 kB
  • After minification 1.1 kB
  • After compression 395 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rtu.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.0 kB or 72% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (34%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

38

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RTU. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rtu.ru

rtu.ru

613 ms

style.css

style.css

193 ms

watch.js

watch.js

1 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

16 ms

js_vert.php

js_vert.php

467 ms

banup.php

banup.php

412 ms

context.js

context.js

226 ms

ca-pub-8933051802577605.js

ca-pub-8933051802577605.js

108 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

100 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

107 ms

cycounter

cycounter

309 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

164 ms

top_triangle1.gif

top_triangle1.gif

164 ms

top_triangle2.gif

top_triangle2.gif

249 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

244 ms

bullet2.gif

bullet2.gif

244 ms

search.gif

search.gif

247 ms

mail.gif

mail.gif

245 ms

s_arm20061129221627.jpg

s_arm20061129221627.jpg

245 ms

s_arm20120214145445.jpg

s_arm20120214145445.jpg

336 ms

s_arm20090512193513.jpg

s_arm20090512193513.jpg

337 ms

s_arm20160330150626.jpg

s_arm20160330150626.jpg

336 ms

s_arm20040301132425.jpg

s_arm20040301132425.jpg

340 ms

s_arm20100914153016.jpg

s_arm20100914153016.jpg

339 ms

s_arm20070410072807.jpg

s_arm20070410072807.jpg

340 ms

s_arm20090325005353.jpg

s_arm20090325005353.jpg

425 ms

s_arm20120522090738.jpg

s_arm20120522090738.jpg

428 ms

s_arm2240.jpg

s_arm2240.jpg

428 ms

s_arm20081008093718.jpg

s_arm20081008093718.jpg

429 ms

_s_dnt17.jpg

_s_dnt17.jpg

429 ms

_s_dnt14.jpg

_s_dnt14.jpg

434 ms

_s_dnt13.jpg

_s_dnt13.jpg

511 ms

_s_dnt12.jpg

_s_dnt12.jpg

519 ms

_s_dnt11.jpg

_s_dnt11.jpg

519 ms

_s_dnt10.jpg

_s_dnt10.jpg

521 ms

_s_dnt9.jpg

_s_dnt9.jpg

523 ms

_s_dnt8.jpg

_s_dnt8.jpg

529 ms

ads

ads

239 ms

osd.js

osd.js

15 ms

context_static_r1082.js

context_static_r1082.js

345 ms

js_vert.php

js_vert.php

1325 ms

ban2.gif

ban2.gif

94 ms

136841

136841

210 ms

watch.js

watch.js

1 ms

x90

x90

170 ms

masmeb.ru

masmeb.ru

276 ms

www.gved.ru

www.gved.ru

416 ms

xn--2016-43dr0b5aaqkmcsp.xn--p1ai

xn--2016-43dr0b5aaqkmcsp.xn--p1ai

555 ms

ads

ads

239 ms

ads

ads

180 ms

hit

hit

441 ms

banup.php

banup.php

111 ms

ban38.gif

ban38.gif

214 ms

abg.js

abg.js

54 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

90 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

129 ms

9028872026341627039

9028872026341627039

89 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

44 ms

s

s

39 ms

push

push

121 ms

hit

hit

134 ms

pixel

pixel

16 ms

j6SDDiQit5YY48GNgPpnCluJgoNCzbKlh5o6eVjReZI.js

j6SDDiQit5YY48GNgPpnCluJgoNCzbKlh5o6eVjReZI.js

4 ms

Accessibility Review

rtu.ru accessibility score

56

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

rtu.ru best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

rtu.ru SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rtu.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rtu.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

rtu.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RTU. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: