Tools & Wizards About Us
rtusemresult.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

rtusemresult.in

RTU Results ESuvidha Portal :: RTUsemResult.in

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

132 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

699 ms

rtusemresult.in screenshot

About Website

Visit rtusemresult.in now to see the best up-to-date Rt Usem Result content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rtusemresult.in

RTU, kota I II III IV V VI VII VIII Semesters Exam Results 2014 2015 e-suvidha Update Portal. All Sem eSuvidha info for B.Tech, M.Tech, MBA, B.Arch, M.Arch, MCA, BCA, BHMCT, MHMCT etc.

Visit rtusemresult.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Rtusemresult.in page load time and found that the first response time was 132 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rtusemresult.in performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

rtusemresult.in

132 ms

rtusemresult.in

329 ms

Xc1BDoAgDATAD0mKJ7_hF7CUiEFKaDnweyNRD542k2x2LQTGJuRBtCea7OcUNyiVVHvZWRlQ5PF6-9c8SnKd6pvTDMhZHaoJXE-zQMyYmicZO-NLLg.css

70 ms

css

65 ms

css

78 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Rtusemresult.in, 14% (8 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 11% (6 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (466 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 327.0 kB (31%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

740.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rtusemresult.in main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 658.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 42.2 kB

  • Original 50.8 kB
  • After minification 46.1 kB
  • After compression 8.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 91.4 kB

  • Original 658.5 kB
  • After minification 567.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rt Usem Result needs image optimization as it can save up to 91.4 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 135.7 kB

  • Original 289.7 kB
  • After minification 288.4 kB
  • After compression 154.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 135.7 kB or 47% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 57.9 kB

  • Original 68.3 kB
  • After minification 54.1 kB
  • After compression 10.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rtusemresult.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 57.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (50%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rt Usem Result. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rtusemresult.in

rtusemresult.in

132 ms

rtusemresult.in

rtusemresult.in

329 ms

Xc1BDoAgDATAD0mKJ7_hF7CUiEFKaDnweyNRD542k2x2LQTGJuRBtCea7OcUNyiVVHvZWRlQ5PF6-9c8SnKd6pvTDMhZHaoJXE-zQMyYmicZO-NLLg.css

Xc1BDoAgDATAD0mKJ7_hF7CUiEFKaDnweyNRD542k2x2LQTGJuRBtCea7OcUNyiVVHvZWRlQ5PF6-9c8SnKd6pvTDMhZHaoJXE-zQMyYmicZO-NLLg.css

70 ms

css

css

65 ms

css

css

78 ms

M9bPKixNLaoEAA.js

M9bPKixNLaoEAA.js

260 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

171 ms

modernizr-2.6.1-respond-1.1.0.min.js

modernizr-2.6.1-respond-1.1.0.min.js

170 ms

M9BPy08uLU5N0c_JTNIvKEotKaksyMgvydfPKixNLarUgwgFgIQA.js

M9BPy08uLU5N0c_JTNIvKEotKaksyMgvydfPKixNLarUgwgFgIQA.js

199 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

30 ms

PYxBDoAgDAQ_BBRPvkcLJCVAIy0m_l5M1Nvu7GQ9JMYhMUAWmEG5Gv-zQjsk0pOCQD5G7Jd7q1kAuemGahP3aleghmWEKM_R587FVWo3.js

PYxBDoAgDAQ_BBRPvkcLJCVAIy0m_l5M1Nvu7GQ9JMYhMUAWmEG5Gv-zQjsk0pOCQD5G7Jd7q1kAuemGahP3aleghmWEKM_R587FVWo3.js

196 ms

M9RPzs8rSUwu0U3LL8rVNdfPzEvOKU1JLdbPKtYvTi7KLCgpBgA.js

M9RPzs8rSUwu0U3LL8rVNdfPzEvOKU1JLdbPKtYvTi7KLCgpBgA.js

226 ms

normalize.min.css

normalize.min.css

164 ms

main.css

main.css

165 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

74 ms

tiny_grid.png

tiny_grid.png

147 ms

ico_comments.png

ico_comments.png

76 ms

RTU-B.Tech-4th-sem-Result-2015-main-back-Esuvidha-info-portal.jpg

RTU-B.Tech-4th-sem-Result-2015-main-back-Esuvidha-info-portal.jpg

170 ms

RTU-B.Tech-3rd-sem-after-reval-Result-2015-main-back-Esuvidha-info-portal.jpg

RTU-B.Tech-3rd-sem-after-reval-Result-2015-main-back-Esuvidha-info-portal.jpg

172 ms

RTU-B.Arch-2nd-4th-sem-Result-2015-main-back-Esuvidha-info-portal.jpg

RTU-B.Arch-2nd-4th-sem-Result-2015-main-back-Esuvidha-info-portal.jpg

171 ms

RTU-B.Tech-6th-Sem-Result-2015-Main-Back-Esuvidha-info-Portal.jpg

RTU-B.Tech-6th-Sem-Result-2015-Main-Back-Esuvidha-info-Portal.jpg

172 ms

rtu-m.tech-1st-sem-main-back-result-2015-esuvidha-info-portal.jpg

rtu-m.tech-1st-sem-main-back-result-2015-esuvidha-info-portal.jpg

259 ms

rtu-mca-2nd-4th-sem-main-back-Result-2015-esuvidha-info-portal.jpg

rtu-mca-2nd-4th-sem-main-back-Result-2015-esuvidha-info-portal.jpg

228 ms

rtu-mba-1st-sem-main-back-after-revaluation-result-2015-esuvidha-info-portal.jpg

rtu-mba-1st-sem-main-back-after-revaluation-result-2015-esuvidha-info-portal.jpg

259 ms

RTU-B.Arch-1st-sem-main-back-exam-results-2015-esuvidha-info-portal.jpg

RTU-B.Arch-1st-sem-main-back-exam-results-2015-esuvidha-info-portal.jpg

288 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

34 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTZS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTZS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

43 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzJS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzJS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

70 ms

PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf

PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf

140 ms

1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf

1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf

69 ms

ca-pub-9125397829092008.js

ca-pub-9125397829092008.js

15 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

129 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

62 ms

sprite_icons_posts.png

sprite_icons_posts.png

239 ms

ads

ads

320 ms

osd.js

osd.js

8 ms

ads

ads

261 ms

ads

ads

245 ms

ads

ads

176 ms

ads

ads

156 ms

ads

ads

466 ms

ico_search.png

ico_search.png

136 ms

name.png

name.png

133 ms

email.png

email.png

134 ms

green.png

green.png

133 ms

social_ico_sprite.png

social_ico_sprite.png

132 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

134 ms

abg.js

abg.js

129 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

169 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

168 ms

10043134657284552159

10043134657284552159

186 ms

12966230933094491000

12966230933094491000

150 ms

collect

collect

86 ms

s

s

40 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

70 ms

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

11 ms

9219332660106672783

9219332660106672783

64 ms

SEO Factors

rtusemresult.in SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rtusemresult.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rtusemresult.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rtusemresult.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rt Usem Result. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: