2 sec in total
147 ms
1.3 sec
527 ms
Click here to check amazing Rubberstamper content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rubberstamper.com
Visit rubberstamper.comWe analyzed Rubberstamper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 147 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
rubberstamper.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value6.7 s
36/100
10%
Value1,880 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value14.0 s
10/100
10%
147 ms
58 ms
22 ms
21 ms
49 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rubberstamper.com, 60% (53 requests) were made to Craftideas.com and 10% (9 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (509 ms) relates to the external source Craftideas.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (14%)
7.5 MB
6.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Rubberstamper.com main page is 7.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 6.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 265.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 265.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 195.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rubberstamper images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 396.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 396.6 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 199.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rubberstamper.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 199.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (36%)
84
54
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rubberstamper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
rubberstamper.com
147 ms
www.craftideas.com
58 ms
all.min.css
22 ms
craftideas.min.css
21 ms
modernizr.min.js
49 ms
jquery.min.js
33 ms
angular.js
39 ms
angular-resource.js
106 ms
angular-ui-router.min.js
45 ms
restangular.min.js
45 ms
bootstrap.min.js
38 ms
underscore-min.js
40 ms
underscore.string.min.js
116 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
41 ms
slick.min.js
102 ms
head.min.js
36 ms
ujc5vjz.js
125 ms
all.min.js
32 ms
all.min.js
32 ms
craftideas.min.js
31 ms
www.craftideas.com
121 ms
analytics.js
14 ms
logo-ci.png
15 ms
logo_mobile-craftideas.png
13 ms
sewn%20easter%20baskets.jpg
50 ms
mosaic%20vase.jpg
95 ms
lavender%20and%20lemon%20earrings.jpg
77 ms
enchanted-makeovers.jpg
39 ms
painting-tips.jpg
71 ms
needle-punch.jpg
51 ms
bead-making.jpg
72 ms
stained-glass.jpg
93 ms
knit%20easter%20chicks.jpg
328 ms
spinrite%20shawl.jpg
323 ms
springtime%20fabric%20place%20setting.jpg
329 ms
monoprint%20monogram%20notecards.jpg
344 ms
seuss-coloring-lead.png
446 ms
dress-girl-around-world.jpg
323 ms
mossy-paper-collage.jpg
344 ms
F04-0416CIa.jpeg
381 ms
enchanted-makeovers.jpg
344 ms
lavender%20and%20lemon%20earrings.jpg
345 ms
altered%20wedding%20frame.jpg
409 ms
sewn%20easter%20baskets.jpg
439 ms
mermaid%20fabric%20designs.jpg
436 ms
fused%20dragonfly%20suncatcher.jpg
420 ms
floral%20resin%20switch%20plates.jpg
463 ms
etched%20floral%20plates.jpg
484 ms
harlequin%20painted%20tea%20set.jpg
486 ms
mixed%20media%20family%20canvas.jpg
509 ms
amour%20coffee%20mug.jpg
494 ms
footer-logo-3.png
481 ms
footer-logo-4.png
481 ms
footer-logo-1.png
491 ms
footer-logo-6.png
493 ms
footer-logo-5.png
488 ms
logo_footer.png
493 ms
gpt.js
28 ms
sdk.js
333 ms
collect
16 ms
menu_icon-linn.png
470 ms
magnifying_glass.png
470 ms
icon-social.png
471 ms
pubads_impl_82.js
47 ms
collect
281 ms
cnt-connect.jpg
416 ms
cnt-facebook.jpg
418 ms
cnt-pinterest.jpg
425 ms
cnt-instagram.jpg
423 ms
cnt-youtube.jpg
423 ms
ads
403 ms
container.html
141 ms
_jcr_content.contentmodel.page.json
256 ms
100 ms
xd_arbiter.php
249 ms
xd_arbiter.php
457 ms
categorized_list_cra.contentmodel.component.json
12 ms
craft-ideas-article-excerpt-container.contentmodel.component.json
14 ms
expansion_embed.js
40 ms
17148763344427238448
59 ms
osd.js
41 ms
m_js_controller.js
34 ms
abg.js
33 ms
favicon
60 ms
s
43 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
32 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
10 ms
x_button_blue2.png
10 ms
favicon
12 ms
rubberstamper.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
rubberstamper.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rubberstamper.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rubberstamper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Rubberstamper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rubberstamper.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rubberstamper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: