3.1 sec in total
409 ms
2 sec
752 ms
Click here to check amazing Rucompromat content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rucompromat.com
<p>РуКомпромат: Энциклопедия Библиотеки Компромата: RuCompromat</p>
Visit rucompromat.comWe analyzed Rucompromat.com page load time and found that the first response time was 409 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
rucompromat.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
81/100
10%
Value2.7 s
85/100
25%
Value4.7 s
68/100
10%
Value3,800 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.009
100/100
15%
Value10.2 s
25/100
10%
409 ms
146 ms
137 ms
144 ms
86 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Rucompromat.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (608 ms) belongs to the original domain Rucompromat.com.
Page size can be reduced by 81.5 kB (54%)
151.9 kB
70.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Rucompromat.com main page is 151.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 66.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.5 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rucompromat images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 43.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 43.1 kB or 64% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (75%)
60
15
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rucompromat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rucompromat.com
409 ms
vendor.css
146 ms
style.css
137 ms
modernizr-2.6.2-respond-1.1.0.min.js
144 ms
main.js
86 ms
g-header.css
74 ms
g-footer.css
301 ms
g-layout.css
306 ms
b-timeline.css
302 ms
b-archive-main.css
299 ms
b-footer-pages.css
300 ms
b-footer-socials.css
300 ms
b-flat-list.css
376 ms
b-add-this.css
374 ms
b-ref-words.css
478 ms
b-person.css
482 ms
b-article.css
480 ms
g-last-lists.css
463 ms
g-origin.css
487 ms
normalize.css
504 ms
main.css
528 ms
bootstrap.min.css
608 ms
datepicker.css
546 ms
fontello.css
549 ms
tt.css
555 ms
1_1_FFECB9FF_FFCC99FF_0_pageviews
493 ms
bg.jpg
79 ms
sdk.js
73 ms
glyphicons-halflings.png
97 ms
widgets.js
84 ms
watch.js
465 ms
fontello.woff
94 ms
hit
271 ms
jquery-1.10.1.min.js
203 ms
bootstrap.min.js
99 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.js
98 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.ru.js
100 ms
typeahead.min.js
100 ms
hogan-2.0.0.js
129 ms
plugins.js
164 ms
app.js
164 ms
like.php
154 ms
170 ms
xd_arbiter.php
83 ms
xd_arbiter.php
152 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
154 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
181 ms
jquery-1.10.1.min.js
227 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
161 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
177 ms
hit
135 ms
syndication
122 ms
636613001634779137
207 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.ru.html
51 ms
bootstrap.min.js
79 ms
advert.gif
98 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.js
117 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
29 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
76 ms
1NkPj3ab_normal.png
160 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.ru.js
92 ms
1
85 ms
typeahead.min.js
76 ms
rucompromat.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rucompromat.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
rucompromat.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rucompromat.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rucompromat.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rucompromat.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rucompromat. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: