Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 77

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

ruf.de

ruf Jugendreisen | Jetzt online buchen!

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

344 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

432 ms

ruf.de screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ruf.de homepage info - get ready to check Ruf best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about ruf.de

Finde die besten Jugendreisen 2024! Sommerurlaub ✓ Camps ✓ Partyurlaub ✓ kostenlose Stornierungsmöglichkeit!

Visit ruf.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Ruf.de page load time and found that the first response time was 344 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ruf.de performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.9 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,390 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.038

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.8 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ruf.de

344 ms

www.ruf.de

432 ms

styles.css

181 ms

homepage2015.css

185 ms

tinyscrollbar.css

184 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Ruf.de, 8% (6 requests) were made to Secure.livechatinc.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.livechatinc.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ruf.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (60%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

789.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Ruf.de main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 70.1 kB

  • Original 83.9 kB
  • After minification 64.5 kB
  • After compression 13.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.4 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 35.2 kB

  • Original 386.1 kB
  • After minification 350.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ruf images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 767.9 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 353.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 767.9 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 319.2 kB

  • Original 389.9 kB
  • After minification 386.7 kB
  • After compression 70.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ruf.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 319.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (55%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ruf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ruf.de accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

ruf.de best practices score

77

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

ruf.de SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ruf.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ruf.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ruf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: