2.2 sec in total
12 ms
1.5 sec
662 ms
Click here to check amazing Rufus Programmer content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rufusprogrammer.com
iOS, 3D Graphics and Data
Visit rufusprogrammer.comWe analyzed Rufusprogrammer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 12 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
rufusprogrammer.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
58/100
10%
Value4.5 s
37/100
25%
Value3.8 s
83/100
10%
Value1,130 ms
23/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value17.7 s
4/100
10%
12 ms
289 ms
193 ms
194 ms
204 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Rufusprogrammer.com, 36% (29 requests) were made to Fonts.wp.com and 12% (10 requests) were made to Rufusmall.files.wordpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (964 ms) relates to the external source Rufusmall.files.wordpress.com.
Page size can be reduced by 148.8 kB (8%)
2.0 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Rufusprogrammer.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 116.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 116.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rufus Programmer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 315 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rufusprogrammer.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (52%)
48
23
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rufus Programmer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rufusprogrammer.com
12 ms
rufusprogrammer.com
289 ms
193 ms
style.css
194 ms
204 ms
204 ms
200 ms
css
233 ms
207 ms
global.css
201 ms
214 ms
hovercards.min.js
213 ms
wpgroho.js
205 ms
208 ms
208 ms
smart.js
216 ms
210 ms
index.min.js
207 ms
index.min.js
209 ms
207 ms
w.js
210 ms
global-print.css
2 ms
conf
269 ms
ga.js
212 ms
cropped-img_113612.jpg
348 ms
e3b60eb45c4646a88f9858e556cc6784c496788d850385b1c5a81a24aa4b6539
294 ms
7a94ab5f28a0f3454c19ffab9e80203a36529b5344abdb765c3e8db85088a84a
268 ms
wpcom-gray-white.png
78 ms
a78174d80d7d500cbddba57861390cf388cecb7726c8148e1b891499663ae944
345 ms
screenshot-2019-07-11-at-04.29.54-e1562816510811.png
619 ms
screen-shot-2016-07-16-at-22-18-25.png
808 ms
img_2596.jpg
326 ms
img_2122.jpg
375 ms
simulator-screen-shot-27-jan-2016-00-37-55.png
487 ms
screen-shot-2016-01-27-at-00-20-48.png
964 ms
img_2103.jpg
486 ms
img_2090.jpg
584 ms
img_2081.png
707 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdo3cOWxw.woff
306 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwmRdo3cOWxy40.woff
305 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwmBdo3cOWxy40.woff
305 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlBdo3cOWxy40.woff
305 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwmxdo3cOWxy40.woff
306 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwkxdo3cOWxy40.woff
329 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwmhdo3cOWxy40.woff
355 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7jujVj9w.woff
356 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qNq7jujVj9_mf.woff
355 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qN67jujVj9_mf.woff
355 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qO67jujVj9_mf.woff
355 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qNK7jujVj9_mf.woff
387 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qPK7jujVj9_mf.woff
415 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qNa7jujVj9_mf.woff
416 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdo3cOWxw.woff
301 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwmRdo3cOWxy40.woff
415 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwmBdo3cOWxy40.woff
415 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlBdo3cOWxy40.woff
415 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwmxdo3cOWxy40.woff
437 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwkxdo3cOWxy40.woff
444 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwmhdo3cOWxy40.woff
442 ms
wlprgwnQFlxs_wD3CFSMYmFaaCjASONS_LNte6KvIEk.woff
437 ms
wlprgwnQFlxs_wD3CFSMYmFaaCjASONc_LNte6KvIEkYgg.woff
480 ms
wlprgwnQFlxs_wD3CFSMYmFaaCjASONd_LNte6KvIEkYgg.woff
484 ms
wlprgwnQFlxs_wD3CFSMYmFaaCieSONS_LNte6KvIEk.woff
480 ms
wlprgwnQFlxs_wD3CFSMYmFaaCieSONc_LNte6KvIEkYgg.woff
480 ms
wlprgwnQFlxs_wD3CFSMYmFaaCieSONd_LNte6KvIEkYgg.woff
550 ms
wlprgwnQFlxs_wD3CFSMYmFaaCh5T-NS_LNte6KvIEk.woff
482 ms
wlprgwnQFlxs_wD3CFSMYmFaaCh5T-Nc_LNte6KvIEkYgg.woff
498 ms
wlprgwnQFlxs_wD3CFSMYmFaaCh5T-Nd_LNte6KvIEkYgg.woff
602 ms
Genericons.svg
211 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
25 ms
shCore.css
87 ms
shThemeDefault.css
86 ms
__utm.gif
90 ms
ata.js
196 ms
g.gif
147 ms
170 ms
remote-login.php
211 ms
g.gif
142 ms
g.gif
165 ms
actionbar.css
4 ms
actionbar.js
24 ms
rufusprogrammer.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rufusprogrammer.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
rufusprogrammer.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rufusprogrammer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rufusprogrammer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rufusprogrammer.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rufus Programmer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: