6.7 sec in total
451 ms
3.7 sec
2.5 sec
Click here to check amazing Rugby Talk content for South Africa. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rugby-talk.com
Visit rugby-talk.comWe analyzed Rugby-talk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 451 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
rugby-talk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value6.5 s
39/100
10%
Value160 ms
94/100
30%
Value0.653
8/100
15%
Value6.2 s
62/100
10%
451 ms
129 ms
150 ms
150 ms
151 ms
Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Rugby-talk.com, 17% (17 requests) were made to Static.superbru.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Superbru.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (756 ms) belongs to the original domain Rugby-talk.com.
Page size can be reduced by 513.0 kB (30%)
1.7 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Rugby-talk.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 170.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 170.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 101.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rugby Talk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 168.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 168.0 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 73.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rugby-talk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 73.2 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (21%)
100
79
The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rugby Talk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.rugby-talk.com
451 ms
style.css
129 ms
bwp-recent-comments-noava.css
150 ms
ad-minister.css
150 ms
style.responsive.css
151 ms
jquery.js
250 ms
script.js
151 ms
script.responsive.js
199 ms
useronline.js
161 ms
wp-embed.min.js
142 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
70 ms
analytics.js
85 ms
page.jpeg
740 ms
header.png
728 ms
object1471652912.png
738 ms
object1249447988.png
735 ms
footerfacebookicon.png
727 ms
footertwittericon.png
726 ms
menuseparator.png
729 ms
spacer.gif
730 ms
postheadericon.png
732 ms
postdateicon.png
733 ms
postauthoricon.png
735 ms
brazillogo-251x300.jpg
739 ms
postcommentsicon.png
734 ms
SIX-Nations.png
740 ms
England11.gif
743 ms
Ireland11.gif
740 ms
DHL-Stormers.jpg
743 ms
Vodacom-Blue-Bulls.jpg
741 ms
Southern-Kings-smaller2.jpg
744 ms
Cell-C-Sharks-Super-Rugby.jpg
744 ms
Western-Force1.jpg
745 ms
Melbourne-Rebels.png
746 ms
Waratahs1.jpg
747 ms
Reds.jpg
748 ms
Crusaders.jpg
748 ms
Chiefs.jpg
749 ms
Sunwolves.jpg
750 ms
Emirates-Lions.png
753 ms
Wales9.gif
751 ms
France4.gif
753 ms
Jaguares.jpg
755 ms
Toyota-Cheetahs.jpg
754 ms
Brumbies1.jpg
755 ms
Hurricanes.jpg
756 ms
Blues.jpg
756 ms
Highlanders.jpg
719 ms
Rugby-Talk-Logo-PNG-796-x-266.png
210 ms
SuperBru-Logo.jpg
109 ms
postbullets.png
89 ms
edaly-300x300.jpg
169 ms
Maties.png
159 ms
Tuks.png
160 ms
UJ.jpg
160 ms
CUT.png
175 ms
Super-18-Trophy-small.jpg
362 ms
taqelehero-300x300.jpg
392 ms
Pukke.jpg
259 ms
UJ1.jpg
248 ms
NMMU1.png
249 ms
Italy1.gif
266 ms
rugbyfun.jpg
326 ms
UCT2.png
336 ms
Shimlas1.jpg
330 ms
Pukke1.jpg
332 ms
Varsity-Cup-2011-2011-001.jpg
411 ms
World-Rugby-Sevens-Series-Logo.png
417 ms
Wales.gif
405 ms
Scotland2.gif
411 ms
France.gif
442 ms
Toulon-RFC-Logo.jpg
488 ms
SIX-Nations-2012-003.png
512 ms
gambling-300x155.jpg
501 ms
postquote.png
475 ms
blockbullets.png
489 ms
icon_comment.png
515 ms
searchicon.png
565 ms
linkid.js
39 ms
pool_snippet.php
72 ms
pool_snippet.php
109 ms
pool_snippet.php
182 ms
collect
11 ms
collect
54 ms
pool_11513455.html
32 ms
logo_flat.png
18 ms
15.gif
22 ms
17.gif
22 ms
0.gif
18 ms
16.gif
21 ms
19.gif
21 ms
yellow_cap.png
22 ms
447.gif
88 ms
448.gif
25 ms
451.gif
23 ms
452.gif
24 ms
445.gif
25 ms
12.gif
14 ms
4.gif
12 ms
3.gif
12 ms
2.gif
12 ms
11.gif
11 ms
rugby-talk.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[role] values are not valid
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rugby-talk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rugby-talk.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rugby-talk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rugby-talk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rugby-talk.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rugby Talk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: