7.4 sec in total
1.1 sec
4.3 sec
2 sec
Click here to check amazing Ruggetech content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ruggetech.com
Rugged Tablets, PDAs, Notebooks & field devices for tough environments with wireless networking capabilities, synchronize data with ease, Loaded with upgraded features, Barcode, RFID, magnetic stripe ...
Visit ruggetech.comWe analyzed Ruggetech.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
ruggetech.com performance score
1053 ms
86 ms
170 ms
242 ms
246 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Ruggetech.com, 13% (11 requests) were made to Google.com and 11% (10 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Ruggetech.com.
Page size can be reduced by 953.6 kB (55%)
1.7 MB
775.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Ruggetech.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 493.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ruggetech needs image optimization as it can save up to 493.1 kB or 48% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 83.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 83.8 kB or 36% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 306.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ruggetech.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 306.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (52%)
75
36
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ruggetech. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ruggetech.com
1053 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
86 ms
style.min.css
170 ms
theme.min.css
242 ms
frontend-1.0.1.css
246 ms
jquery.dropdown.css
251 ms
dashicons.min.css
338 ms
style.css
341 ms
renew.css
349 ms
renew.css
318 ms
jquery.js
410 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
332 ms
jquery.dropdown.min.js
402 ms
cs-head.js
436 ms
js
67 ms
css
72 ms
scripts.js
499 ms
main.js
498 ms
api.js
99 ms
cs-body.js
642 ms
x.js
644 ms
comment-reply.min.js
633 ms
wp-embed.min.js
635 ms
gtm.js
201 ms
embed
160 ms
logo3.png
153 ms
6_6ich-1-1-1.png
222 ms
8_ich-e1545825116968.png
1033 ms
10_ich.png
1033 ms
icon1.png
153 ms
icon2.png
250 ms
icon3.png
220 ms
4_ich.png
249 ms
5_ich.png
341 ms
12_ich1.png
1194 ms
fieldnote11-2.jpg
1323 ms
fieldnote14_new.jpg
1538 ms
b.jpg
1540 ms
b-1.jpg
1321 ms
icon6.png
1321 ms
icon4.png
1539 ms
icon5.png
1539 ms
icon7.png
1538 ms
icon8.png
1538 ms
icon9.png
1661 ms
js
176 ms
conversion_async.js
81 ms
loader.js
170 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrc.woff
281 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrc.woff
1019 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrc.woff
1150 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWA.woff
1236 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-.woff
1237 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1719 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1542 ms
analytics.js
804 ms
b29439e1-18be-4f16-96ea-31b5d853dc83.js
950 ms
js
1165 ms
1045 ms
call-tracking_2.js
837 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1231 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1230 ms
recaptcha__en.js
883 ms
init_embed.js
482 ms
collect
234 ms
collect
466 ms
205 ms
common.js
146 ms
util.js
323 ms
map.js
140 ms
google4.png
235 ms
overlay.js
220 ms
wcm
209 ms
onion.js
209 ms
search_impl.js
209 ms
StaticMapService.GetMapImage
317 ms
in.php
372 ms
kh
148 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
97 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
141 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
139 ms
ga-audiences
122 ms
vt
108 ms
vt
105 ms
vt
96 ms
vt
102 ms
vt
101 ms
ruggetech.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ruggetech.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Ruggetech.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ruggetech.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ruggetech. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: